Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
In our state, many a couple with teenage kids has fallen
[#permalink]
10 Mar 2020, 21:39
6
5
Bookmarks
Question 1
00:00
Question Stats:
74% (00:49) correct
26% (01:03) wrong based on 222 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
A
B
C
D
E
In our state, many a couple with teenage kids has fallen for the latest food fad: saladism. However, all teenagers need a lot of protein - that the body can absorb and imbibe easily - to grow in terms of height. Therefore, their parents should give them a diet heavy on fish, meat and eggs.
Which of the following is an assumption involved in the argument above?
(A) Saladism is bad for children.
(B) It is possible for many adults to adopt a practice that has no logical reasons to be adopted.
(C) Salads do not contain enough protein.
(D) The protein that are harder to absorb and imbibe do not help a teenager to grow in height.
(E) Fish, meat and eggs contain protein of different sorts.
Re: In our state, many a couple with teenage kids has fallen
[#permalink]
30 Aug 2026, 04:35
Expert Reply
Explanation
The argument's core logic is:
Teenagers need a lot of protein that is easily absorbed to grow. Therefore, parents should give them a diet heavy on fish, meat, and eggs.
This conclusion only works if we assume that the alternative-the "saladism" fad-does not provide enough of that easily absorbed protein. The author is implicitly dismissing salads as a sufficient source, so the conclusion that fish/meat/eggs are necessary rests on that assumption.
Why the other options are incorrect:
(A) Saladism is bad for children. This is too broad. The argument only needs to assume that saladism is inadequate in protein, not that it is entirely "bad" in every way. This overstates the assumption. (B) It is possible for many adults to adopt a practice that has no logical reasons to be adopted. This is completely irrelevant to the teenage nutrition argument. (D) The protein that are harder to absorb and imbibe do not help a teenager to grow in height. The argument says teenagers need protein that is easy to absorb-it does not claim that hard-to-absorb protein is useless. The conclusion does not rely on ruling out harder-to-absorb proteins entirely. (E) Fish, meat and eggs contain protein of different sorts. The argument does not require that these foods contain different proteins-only that they contain the right kind (easily absorbed) in sufficient amounts.
gmatclubot
Re: In our state, many a couple with teenage kids has fallen [#permalink]