Last visit was: 03 Aug 2025, 15:19 It is currently 03 Aug 2025, 15:19

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 32910
Own Kudos [?]: 39259 [2]
Given Kudos: 26437
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 32910
Own Kudos [?]: 39259 [0]
Given Kudos: 26437
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 32910
Own Kudos [?]: 39259 [0]
Given Kudos: 26437
Send PM
Re: As research into artificial intelligence progresses, some futurists ar [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Our concern is about replacing.

E tells us about productivity. There is nothing in E that helps us to weaken the argument.

Regards

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: As research into artificial intelligence progresses, some futurists ar [#permalink]
Again, I must respectfully disagree. There are only two sentences I see in this short paragraph that even comes remotely close to Cs claims about more creative fields. The sentences, " However reasonable this fear may seem, humans need not worry about being completely replaced in the job market. Currently, robots have replaced humans only in rote, repetitive jobs, such as automobile assembly lines." That's not close enough to suddenly jump to a conclusion which includes (and I believe suddenly 'introduces' ) artistic arts. Not only that, but C suggests that art experts couldn't distinguish between human-created, and artificially-created art. In the present, NOT the future. If that is the case, human artists and future and PRESENT societies actually have PLENTY to worry about. If a machine (or device) can replicate the skill of even non-repetitive and more creative tasks or achievements, that poses a problem. There are already lawsuits and controversies concerning copyright and patent infringements, etc, and not just between people, but people using various hardware or software. If art is to endure, the artists must come up with ideas that a panel of experts CAN distinguish from artificial creations. The paragraph's reading comp questions already say that it's hard to tell the difference between a purely human effort to create more highly regarded individuated art work, and an effort by engineers to match that artistic human genius with devices that are programmed use algorithms to "build better mousetraps," of art. That's engineering, not art, and frankly, many engineers as well as normal people, believe that creativity, itself, simply obeys engineering systems already wired or pre-wired into our brains and behavior. Write back, please, and again tell me patiently why E is incorrect. Thanks. Steve
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: As research into artificial intelligence progresses, some futurists ar [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1091 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne