GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 28Live Online Class with Top GRE Expert Mike Butville
08:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GRE course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP GRE OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon/Wed Sept. 28, 2026 - Dec. 9, 2026, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
The chitinous exoskeleton of arthropods, for all its virtues as a ligh
[#permalink]
14 Jul 2026, 01:01
14 Jul 2026, 01:01
1
Expert Reply
Question 1
00:00
Question Stats:
35% (01:12) correct
65% (01:38) wrong based on 17 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Question 2
00:00
Question Stats:
50% (00:58) correct
50% (02:17) wrong based on 16 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
The chitinous exoskeleton of arthropods, for all its virtues as a lightweight armor and a scaffold for muscle attachment, presents a formidable barrier to direct observation of the animal's internal physiological processes, rendering opaque an entire dimension of invertebrate biology that researchers have long struggled to access. This structural concealment has even complicated the most basic task of describing how arthropods circulate hemolymph through their bodies. When physiologists study the circulatory dynamics of vertebrates, they benefit from a transparent conceptual framework: the closed vascular network, the chambered heart, the predictable branching of vessels — all visible through dissection and well understood from centuries of comparative anatomy. A vertebrate's circulation, whether in a sparrow or a salamander, operates on principles that we recognize as variations on a common architectural plan, and we can trace the movement of blood with considerable confidence. Not so with an arthropod. Until the advent of high-resolution micro-CT imaging, the prevailing understanding of hemolymph flow in even the most studied insect species remained a matter of inference and conjecture, a physiological enigma hidden behind a carapace.
According to the passage, the exoskeleton of arthropods has which of the following consequences?
Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
A. It furnishes a rigid framework to which the animal's muscles can anchor.
B. It conceals the organism's internal physiological operations from view.
C. It provides structural reinforcement to the animal's body.
The passage most strongly suggests which of the following regarding the circulatory systems of vertebrates?
A. Their underlying architecture is more uniform across species than most researchers have traditionally recognized.
B. Their functioning is less predictable than that of arthropod circulatory systems.
C. The ease with which they can be studied belies their genuine anatomical intricacy.
D. They operate on fundamentally different principles than do the hemolymph circulation systems of arthropods.
E. They are more amenable to direct anatomical investigation than are the circulatory mechanisms of arthropods.
- Part of the project: GRE Hard and Tricky Verbal Practice: NEW Questions Daily - Gain 20 Kudos & Get FREE Access to GRE Prep Club TESTS
- Also replying to the unanswered questions
Re: The chitinous exoskeleton of arthropods, for all its virtues as a ligh
[#permalink]
15 Jul 2026, 04:00
15 Jul 2026, 04:00
Expert Reply
Question 1 - Effects of the Exoskeleton (Select All That Apply)
Step 1 - Locate the effects in the passage.
The opening sentence identifies three properties of the exoskeleton:
- "lightweight armor" → structural protection/reinforcement (relevant to C)
- "scaffold for muscle attachment" → framework for muscle anchoring (relevant to A)
- "formidable barrier to direct observation of the animal's internal physiological processes" → conceals internal workings (relevant to B)
Step 2 - Match to choices.
- A (Correct - Select): "Scaffold for muscle attachment" directly corresponds to "furnishes a rigid framework to which the animal's muscles can anchor."
- B (Correct - Select): "Formidable barrier to direct observation" directly corresponds to "conceals the organism's internal physiological operations from view."
- C (Correct - Select): "Lightweight armor" directly corresponds to "provides structural reinforcement to the animal's body."
All three are explicitly stated in the opening sentence.
Step 1 - Locate the effects in the passage.
The opening sentence identifies three properties of the exoskeleton:
- "lightweight armor" → structural protection/reinforcement (relevant to C)
- "scaffold for muscle attachment" → framework for muscle anchoring (relevant to A)
- "formidable barrier to direct observation of the animal's internal physiological processes" → conceals internal workings (relevant to B)
Step 2 - Match to choices.
- A (Correct - Select): "Scaffold for muscle attachment" directly corresponds to "furnishes a rigid framework to which the animal's muscles can anchor."
- B (Correct - Select): "Formidable barrier to direct observation" directly corresponds to "conceals the organism's internal physiological operations from view."
- C (Correct - Select): "Lightweight armor" directly corresponds to "provides structural reinforcement to the animal's body."
All three are explicitly stated in the opening sentence.
Re: The chitinous exoskeleton of arthropods, for all its virtues as a ligh
[#permalink]
15 Jul 2026, 04:45
15 Jul 2026, 04:45
Expert Reply
Question 2 - Inference about Vertebrate Circulatory Systems
Step 1 - Identify the contrast the passage draws.
The passage contrasts arthropods (hemolymph circulation hidden by exoskeleton, poorly understood) with vertebrates (circulation accessible through dissection, well understood from centuries of comparative anatomy, operates on recognizable principles). The vertebrate system is presented as the accessible counterpart to the arthropod system.
Step 2 -Derive the inference.
The contrast implies that vertebrate circulatory systems are easier to study directly through anatomical methods than arthropod systems. This is stated explicitly: vertebrates benefit from "visible through dissection and well understood from centuries of comparative anatomy." The inference is that they are "more amenable to direct anatomical investigation."
Step 3 - Eliminate wrong answers.
- A: The passage says vertebrate circulation operates on "variations on a common architectural plan," but it does not suggest this uniformity is greater than most researchers have traditionally recognized. The comparison is between vertebrates and arthropods, not between current and traditional views of vertebrate uniformity.
- B: The passage says the opposite - vertebrate circulation is presented as more predictable and better understood than arthropod hemolymph flow.
- C: The passage does not mention the "intricacy" of vertebrate circulatory systems or suggest that ease of study "belies" complexity. Out of scope.
- D: The passage contrasts vertebrates and arthropods, but it does not claim their systems operate on "fundamentally different principles." The passage focuses on accessibility of study, not on physiological principles. This overstates the contrast.
- E (Correct): The passage explicitly states that vertebrate circulation is "visible through dissection and well understood," while arthropod circulation "remained a matter of inference and conjecture." The vertebrate system is more amenable to direct anatomical investigation.
Step 1 - Identify the contrast the passage draws.
The passage contrasts arthropods (hemolymph circulation hidden by exoskeleton, poorly understood) with vertebrates (circulation accessible through dissection, well understood from centuries of comparative anatomy, operates on recognizable principles). The vertebrate system is presented as the accessible counterpart to the arthropod system.
Step 2 -Derive the inference.
The contrast implies that vertebrate circulatory systems are easier to study directly through anatomical methods than arthropod systems. This is stated explicitly: vertebrates benefit from "visible through dissection and well understood from centuries of comparative anatomy." The inference is that they are "more amenable to direct anatomical investigation."
Step 3 - Eliminate wrong answers.
- A: The passage says vertebrate circulation operates on "variations on a common architectural plan," but it does not suggest this uniformity is greater than most researchers have traditionally recognized. The comparison is between vertebrates and arthropods, not between current and traditional views of vertebrate uniformity.
- B: The passage says the opposite - vertebrate circulation is presented as more predictable and better understood than arthropod hemolymph flow.
- C: The passage does not mention the "intricacy" of vertebrate circulatory systems or suggest that ease of study "belies" complexity. Out of scope.
- D: The passage contrasts vertebrates and arthropods, but it does not claim their systems operate on "fundamentally different principles." The passage focuses on accessibility of study, not on physiological principles. This overstates the contrast.
- E (Correct): The passage explicitly states that vertebrate circulation is "visible through dissection and well understood," while arthropod circulation "remained a matter of inference and conjecture." The vertebrate system is more amenable to direct anatomical investigation.
