GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
When Songs of the Delta appeared in 1941, it was not the volume its
[#permalink]
22 Sep 2026, 17:03
22 Sep 2026, 17:03
1
Expert Reply
Question 1
00:00
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Question 2
00:00
Question Stats:
78% (03:11) correct
22% (04:33) wrong based on 9 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
When Songs of the Delta appeared in 1941, it was not the volume its compiler had originally envisioned. In this ethnographic account, the collector situates the singers themselves at the center of the narrative, at times placing her own presence within the performance. Yet a different manuscript, composed two years earlier and only recently recovered, contains none of this scaffolding: it presents the lyrics alone, stripped of annotation, biography, or interpretive gloss.
Why the earlier version remained unpublished during the compiler's lifetime cannot be established with certainty, though the commercial logic of the period offers a plausible answer. The novelist and critic Amara Whitfield once characterized Black expressive traditions as a literature that sought to break its own frame—that is, as the ongoing effort of Black artists to transmit the creative work of Black communities without interposing an explanatory voice for the benefit of a white readership. On this reading, the compiler's insistence on letting the songs stand unmediated may simply have arrived too soon for the publishing conventions of the day.
Why the earlier version remained unpublished during the compiler's lifetime cannot be established with certainty, though the commercial logic of the period offers a plausible answer. The novelist and critic Amara Whitfield once characterized Black expressive traditions as a literature that sought to break its own frame—that is, as the ongoing effort of Black artists to transmit the creative work of Black communities without interposing an explanatory voice for the benefit of a white readership. On this reading, the compiler's insistence on letting the songs stand unmediated may simply have arrived too soon for the publishing conventions of the day.
Which sentence in the passage offers a plausible account of why the compiler produced the version of Songs of the Delta that appeared in 1941?
Show: ::
"Why the earlier version remained unpublished during the compiler's lifetime cannot be established with certainty, though the commercial logic of the period offers a plausible answer."
The passage suggests that in preparing the earlier manuscript, the compiler may have done which of the following?
A. Consulted with her publisher about her method of presentation before completing a draft, so as to forestall any misunderstanding.
B. Reduced her presentation of the songs to the absolute minimum in order to accommodate a larger body of collected material.
C. Set the manuscript aside for several decades with the aim of reaching a wider readership at a later date.
D. Agreed, with evident reluctance, to restructure the work by removing elements to which her publisher had objected.
E.Deliberately omitted editorial commentary so that the songs could be presented on their own terms.
- Part of the project: GRE Hard and Tricky Verbal Practice: NEW Questions Daily - Gain 20 Kudos & Get FREE Access to GRE Prep Club TESTS
- Also replying to the unanswered questions
Re: When Songs of the Delta appeared in 1941, it was not the volume its
[#permalink]
03 Oct 2026, 00:32
03 Oct 2026, 00:32
Expert Reply
Passage Analysis & Question Explanations
This passage explores the history and publication context of Songs of the Delta (1941), contrasting the published ethnographic version-which includes annotation and the compiler's presence-with an earlier, unvarnished manuscript containing only the lyrics. It uses Amara Whitfield's critical framework to suggest why the unmediated version might have been rejected by the publishing conventions of the era.
Question 1: Sentence Selection (Identifying the Causal Explanation)
Analysis: The question asks which sentence provides a "plausible account" for why the compiler produced the 1941 version (the ethnographic, scaffolded one) instead of the unmediated one. The text explains that the unmediated manuscript went unpublished because of "the commercial logic of the period," which implies the published version was a concession to those commercial and publishing conventions.
Target Sentence: The sentence acknowledging the commercial logic as a plausible explanation for why the unmediated version stayed unpublished (which directly led to the modified 1941 version being printed instead) serves this structural role. Specifically, the line stating: "Why the earlier version remained unpublished during the compiler's lifetime cannot be established with certainty, though the commercial logic of the period offers a plausible answer." (Or the concluding sentences regarding Whitfield's reading of why the unmediated version arrived "too soon for the publishing conventions of the day.")
This passage explores the history and publication context of Songs of the Delta (1941), contrasting the published ethnographic version-which includes annotation and the compiler's presence-with an earlier, unvarnished manuscript containing only the lyrics. It uses Amara Whitfield's critical framework to suggest why the unmediated version might have been rejected by the publishing conventions of the era.
Question 1: Sentence Selection (Identifying the Causal Explanation)
Analysis: The question asks which sentence provides a "plausible account" for why the compiler produced the 1941 version (the ethnographic, scaffolded one) instead of the unmediated one. The text explains that the unmediated manuscript went unpublished because of "the commercial logic of the period," which implies the published version was a concession to those commercial and publishing conventions.
Target Sentence: The sentence acknowledging the commercial logic as a plausible explanation for why the unmediated version stayed unpublished (which directly led to the modified 1941 version being printed instead) serves this structural role. Specifically, the line stating: "Why the earlier version remained unpublished during the compiler's lifetime cannot be established with certainty, though the commercial logic of the period offers a plausible answer." (Or the concluding sentences regarding Whitfield's reading of why the unmediated version arrived "too soon for the publishing conventions of the day.")
Re: When Songs of the Delta appeared in 1941, it was not the volume its
[#permalink]
03 Oct 2026, 00:33
03 Oct 2026, 00:33
Expert Reply
Question 2: Inferences about the Earlier Manuscript
Question: The passage suggests that in preparing the earlier manuscript, the compiler may have done which of the following?
Option Analysis:
(A) Consulted with her publisher... - Unsupported; there is no mention of when or if she consulted a publisher for the first manuscript.
(B) Reduced her presentation... to accommodate a larger body - Unsupported; the text says the earlier version contained "none of this scaffolding," not that it was done to save space.
(C) Set the manuscript aside for several decades... - Contradicted; the passage notes it was composed two years earlier, not decades.
(D) Agreed, with evident reluctance, to restructure... - Incorrect; the earlier manuscript was the unmediated one, not the restructured one.
(E) Deliberately omitted editorial commentary so that the songs could be presented on their own terms. - Correct. The first paragraph contrasts the 1941 ethnographic account (with annotations and the compiler's presence) with the earlier manuscript that presented "the lyrics alone, stripped of annotation, biography, or interpretive gloss." Furthermore, the second paragraph explains this as an effort to let "the songs stand unmediated."
Correct Answer: E
Question: The passage suggests that in preparing the earlier manuscript, the compiler may have done which of the following?
Option Analysis:
(A) Consulted with her publisher... - Unsupported; there is no mention of when or if she consulted a publisher for the first manuscript.
(B) Reduced her presentation... to accommodate a larger body - Unsupported; the text says the earlier version contained "none of this scaffolding," not that it was done to save space.
(C) Set the manuscript aside for several decades... - Contradicted; the passage notes it was composed two years earlier, not decades.
(D) Agreed, with evident reluctance, to restructure... - Incorrect; the earlier manuscript was the unmediated one, not the restructured one.
(E) Deliberately omitted editorial commentary so that the songs could be presented on their own terms. - Correct. The first paragraph contrasts the 1941 ethnographic account (with annotations and the compiler's presence) with the earlier manuscript that presented "the lyrics alone, stripped of annotation, biography, or interpretive gloss." Furthermore, the second paragraph explains this as an effort to let "the songs stand unmediated."
Correct Answer: E
