Re: The biographer perhaps aspires to rehabilitate the novelist's eclipsed
[#permalink]
26 Apr 2026, 13:16
1. The Logic Structure :
- The Goal: The biographer wants to "rehabilitate" (restore to a former state/fix) a "critical standing" that has been "eclipsed" (obscured/forgotten).
- The Method: To fix a bad reputation, the biographer provides "encomiums" (high praise).
- The Inference: In order to effectively rehabilitate a reputation, the praise cannot be shy or limited; it must be abundant, unrestrained, or generous.
- The Pair: We need two words that mean "given without restraint." Unstinting (A) and Lavish (C) form the most precise synonym pair.
2. Evaluating the Choices :
- A. unstinting: (Correct) Given or giving without restraint; ungrudging. This fits the "rehabilitation" goal perfectly.
- B. stinting: (Opposite Trap) Being very frugal or restrictive. This would not help rehabilitate a reputation.
- C. lavish: (Correct) Sumptuously rich, elaborate, or luxurious; given in great amounts. As an adjective for praise, it is a direct synonym for unstinting.
- D. reticent: (Opposite Trap) Not revealing one's thoughts or feelings readily. If the book were reticent, it wouldn't be "offering" the praise needed for the goal.
- E. unctuous: (Tonal Trap) Excessively flattering or ingratiating; oily. While this is a form of "high praise," it has a negative connotation of insincerity. The GRE rarely pairs a "sincere/high praise" word with an "insincere/negative" word unless the context suggests the author is being critical.
- F. circumspect: (Category Trap) Wary and unwilling to take risks. This describes a cautious approach, which contradicts the "lavish" nature of the praise described.