Last visit was: 22 Nov 2024, 00:02 It is currently 22 Nov 2024, 00:02

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [3]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Apr 2019
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 348
Own Kudos [?]: 955 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Closed-canopy forests, which most people regard as the (i) _ [#permalink]
2
Although I managed to get this one right, there is one point that I would like to make about this question, and it could be be just my own inept mind unable to comprehend clearly.

That said, when I look at the second sentence: In fact, the forest floor is too barren to support large numbers of grazers, and the canopy is too dense to let light-hungry trees like oaks sprout and grow.

This tells me that that the forest is too dry to support large number of grazers, so it would make sense for forest management to stop grazers feeding off on the forest, as intuitively they would try to protect the land. Therefore, the use of the word "yet" in the next sentence seems to be out of place.

Yet traditional forest management usually winds up (ii) ___ deer and bison when their behavior starts to affect trees

Yet traditional forest management usually "winds up" culling deer and bison when their behavior starts to affect trees? Why would you say "yet" because there is no shift in the idea. It makes perfect sense to cull deer and bison if their behavior is affecting the forest, especially when the forest was too barren to begin with.

I don't think ETS would phrase it that way, but again like I mentioned earlier that it could be my way of interpreting this.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1722
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Closed-canopy forests, which most people regard as the (i) _ [#permalink]
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Closed-canopy forests, which most people regard as the (i) _ [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1065 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne