GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2506
Given Kudos: 1053
GPA: 3.39
Re: A chemical company claims that, since only one of 520 rats that were
[#permalink]
13 Nov 2021, 04:21
A – this doesn’t strengthen the chemical company’s claim – we don’t care about ‘other animals’.
B – CORRECT. If the incidence of cancer in this strain is one in 540, then we have reason to believe the sweetener is not carcinogenic for human beings – that one case would be attributable to the spontaneous incidence of cancer in rats.
C – Opposite direction – weakens the chemical company’s claim.
D – Opposite direction – suggest that results from the test of 520 rats may not be accurate for human beings. If certain chemicals that are carcinogenic for human beings are not carcinogenic for rats, then the results could potentially be less accurate for human beings.
E – Out of scope. Lifespan of the strain of rat is not relevant here.