Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 12:51 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 12:51

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28641
Own Kudos [?]: 33131 [1]
Given Kudos: 25178
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2020
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2018
Posts: 87
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28641
Own Kudos [?]: 33131 [0]
Given Kudos: 25178
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatization of Social [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Privatizing the system for the future recipients, while gradually (iii) ______ the system for current and near-term recipients, is probably the best way to keep the system viable.

As per the meaning is exactly the contrary.

You do need a new system. As such, you have to eliminate or phase out the old one.


Hope now is more clear
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatization of Social [#permalink]
Carcass wrote:
Privatizing the system for the future recipients, while gradually (iii) ______ the system for current and near-term recipients, is probably the best way to keep the system viable.

As per the meaning is exactly the contrary.

You do need a new system. As such, you have to eliminate or phase out the old one.


Hope now is more clear



For blank 2, Why are we not choosing AGGRAVATED ?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28641
Own Kudos [?]: 33131 [0]
Given Kudos: 25178
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatization of Social [#permalink]
Expert Reply
BeeKay wrote:
Carcass wrote:
Privatizing the system for the future recipients, while gradually (iii) ______ the system for current and near-term recipients, is probably the best way to keep the system viable.

As per the meaning is exactly the contrary.

You do need a new system. As such, you have to eliminate or phase out the old one.


Hope now is more clear



For blank 2, Why are we not choosing AGGRAVATED ?


Because does not have any sense.

We do have a shift in the argument: BEFORE the fund did meet the expectations, NOW no more. So the situation is contrary or reversed.

If was aggravated the line of reasoning was more or less in that manner: the fund was not able to meet the expectations of 10% of the subscribers. However, now the quote arose up to 75%

We , here, have a shift from good to worse. Aggravated would be from so so to worse.

Hope this helps
Prep Club for GRE Bot
[#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Instructor
218 posts
GRE Instructor
1029 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne