Carcass wrote:
Although performance artists working in the tradition of relational aesthetics may appear to be dismantling conventional distinctions between artwork and audience more radically than most of their contemporaries, their practice actually demonstrates (i) _______ structured participation, durational frameworks, and social choreography that can seem (ii) _______ when placed alongside post-internet art, which has occupied the critical vanguard since the mid2000s and which (iii) _______ the algorithmically generated possibility of producing experiences that dissolve entirely the boundary between producer and receiver.
| Blank (i) |
Blank (ii) |
Blank (iii) |
| A. a subversion of |
D. provocative |
G. resists |
| B. a dependence on |
E. restrained |
H. exploits |
| C. an adherence to |
F. incoherent |
I. supersedes |
The relevant context is the contrast between the phrasing "appear to be dismantling" and "dissolves entirely," as applied to the performance artist in question and the post-internet artist, respectively, contrasting the two. Whatever the performance artists are doing is more orthodox than what post-internet artists are doing.
Blank I: "Actually," does the heaving lifting here. They are dismantling, but actually they aren't (in comparison). They are actually
adhering to some orthodoxies.
Subversion has the opposite tone/meaning, and
dependence is irrelevant to the subject of the passage.
Blank II: This adherence is more
restrained than that of post-internet artists.
Provocative has the opposite meaning/tone, and
incoherent is also irrelevant to the subject of the passage.
Blank III: Now the subject is the post-internet artist, which does not show
resistance. What best describes what they do with the algorithmically generated possibility is
exploit. Supersedes implies the post-internet era overtake that other artist, but this is also not the subject of the passage.