Re: Among paleontologists, the study of the Permian-Triassic
[#permalink]
12 Jun 2026, 04:00
Blank (i)
The sentence describes a discipline "in which conjecture so thoroughly (i) ______ hard evidence that speculation flourished virtually unchecked." The result clause ("speculation flourished virtually unchecked") reveals the meaning: conjecture dominated because evidence was scarce. The blank must mean exceeded, surpassed, or vastly outweighed.
- A. was dwarfed by - Was made to seem small by comparison; was greatly exceeded by. If conjecture was dwarfed by evidence, evidence would be the larger force - the opposite of what the sentence describes. Incorrect.
- B. outstripped - Surpassed, exceeded, went beyond. "Conjecture so thoroughly outstripped hard evidence" perfectly captures the idea that theorizing vastly exceeded the available data. Correct.
- C. fluctuated against - Varied in relation to. "Fluctuated" implies back-and-forth change, but the sentence describes a sustained, extreme imbalance, not variability. Incorrect.
Blank (ii)
The second sentence states: "That era has now decisively ended, for the torrent of geochemical and fossil data... has (ii) _______ every proposed causal mechanism save one: the massive volcanic eruptions of the Siberian Traps." The word "save" means "except." The data has done something to all mechanisms except one - meaning the data has removed, eliminated, or weeded out the others. The blank must mean eliminated, filtered out, or narrowed down.
- D. corroborated - Confirmed, supported with evidence. If data corroborated every mechanism except one, it would support all but one - which is the opposite of eliminating them. Incorrect.
- E. winnowed - Sifted through to remove the less useful; narrowed down by elimination. "The torrent of data has winnowed every proposed causal mechanism save one" perfectly captures the process of using evidence to eliminate all but the correct explanation. Correct.
- F. obfuscated - Made unclear, confused, obscured. If data obfuscated all mechanisms, it would make them harder to evaluate - contradicting the idea that one mechanism now stands alone as the answer. Incorrect.