Re: Because of the lack of a comprehensive rail system in the United State
[#permalink]
04 Oct 2025, 00:49
Argument Analysis
1. Premise/Problem: Diesel consumption in trucking is a major issue (air quality and foreign oil dependence).
2. Proposed Solution: Algae biofuel is proposed as a solution because it's efficient, produces cleaner emissions, and avoids food-price inflation associated with corn/soy-based biofuels.
3. Conclusion: The US government should begin production of algae biofuel plants to offset the detrimental effects of diesel.
Goal
To cast doubt, we need a statement that suggests the government's action (beginning production of algae biofuel plants) will not solve the problem or will lead to an unforeseen negative consequence.
Evaluation of Options
- (A) Oil prices have been rising at a steady rate for more than 10 years.
- This supports the premise that dependence on diesel is a problem, but it doesn't challenge the effectiveness of the algae solution. (No doubt cast)
- (B) The high cost of algae-based biofuels will discourage the trucking industry from embracing the new fuel.
- This is the strongest challenger. The conclusion relies on the idea that producing the biofuel will offset the negative effects of diesel. If the fuel is too expensive, the trucking industry-the intended user-will not switch from diesel. If they don't switch, the new biofuel plants will fail to reduce diesel consumption, rendering the government's investment ineffective. (Strong doubt cast)
- (C) Increased domestic oil production would offset dependence on foreign oil and reduce prices.
- This introduces an alternative solution, but it doesn't weaken the viability of the algae solution or the need to address air quality (which oil production does not solve). (Minor doubt, but not the most damaging)
- (D) Many types of algae cannot be used for biofuel production.
- The passage states algae can be used. This statement only suggests the production process might be narrower than expected, not that the overall process is impractical or that the trucking industry won't use it. (Weak doubt)
- (E) Many farmers strongly support the use of corn and soy biofuels.
- This is irrelevant. The core argument is about the negative effects of corn/soy use (food inflation), not the farmers' support for the program. (Irrelevant)
The statement that most directly undermines the conclusion by suggesting the proposed solution won't be adopted by the relevant industry is (B).
The correct choice is (B).