Quote:
There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts - especially at a great cost in money and jobs - to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Introduction (100 words)
The argument that society should not invest heavily in saving endangered species fails to recognize how interconnected our survival is with biodiversity. While cost concerns are valid, they ignore the greater economic and ecological price we pay for extinction. Protecting vulnerable plants and animals is not charity-it's self-preservation. From stabilizing our food supply to preventing natural disasters, conservation efforts provide returns that far outweigh their costs. This essay will demonstrate how species protection benefits human economies, safeguards our health, and can be implemented cost-effectively through smart strategies.
Economic Necessity of Conservation (200 words)
The financial value of preserving species becomes clear when we examine ecosystem servicesthe natural benefits we get for free from a healthy environment. Consider pollinators like bees and butterflies: they contribute over $\$ 200$ billion annually to global agriculture by helping crops reproduce. If these species disappear, farmers would need to spend billions on artificial pollination or face catastrophic harvest failures. Similarly, mangrove forests that shelter endangered species also protect coastal cities from hurricanes and floods-a service worth \$80 billion per year in avoided damage.
The fishing industry offers stark examples of how shortsighted savings lead to massive losses. Canada's Atlantic cod fishery collapsed in the 1990s after years of overfishing, eliminating 40,000 jobs and costing $\$ 2.5$ billion in economic damage. In contrast, sustainable management of Alaskan salmon fisheries has maintained both fish populations and fishing jobs for decades. These cases prove that conservation isn't an expense-it's insurance against much greater economic disasters.
Health and Safety Impacts (200 words)
Beyond economics, biodiversity protects human health in surprising ways. Half of all modern medicines originate from wild plants and animals, including cancer treatments from rainforest plants and painkillers from cone snails. When species go extinct, we lose potential cures foreverthe gastric brooding frog, which went extinct in the 1980s, could have revolutionized ulcer treatment with its unique biology.
Ecological balance also affects disease control. The decline of bats in North America has led to surges in mosquito populations, increasing risks of West Nile virus and other illnesses. In Africa, preserving lion habitats helps control antelope populations that would otherwise overgraze and turn fertile land into desert. These examples show that species preservation is literally a matter of public health-weakening ecosystems makes humans more vulnerable to diseases and food shortages.
Smart, Affordable Protection Strategies (200 words)
Modern conservation has moved beyond expensive, inflexible approaches. Costa Rica's "Payments for Ecosystem Services" program compensates landowners for protecting forests, costing 60\% less than traditional parks while doubling tree cover. Technology has slashed costs too-drones and Al now monitor wildlife areas for a fraction of traditional patrol budgets.
Some solutions even generate revenue. Ecotourism in African game reserves creates more jobs than poaching ever did, with countries like Rwanda earning $\$ 500$ million annually from gorilla tourism. "Debt-for-nature" swaps allow countries to reduce national debt by funding conservation -a strategy that has protected over 50 million acres worldwide.
The most cost-effective approach is prevention. Restoring the Florida Everglades after decades of damage will cost $\$ 20$ billion-ten times what proactive protection would have required. Like maintaining a car, regular upkeep of ecosystems costs far less than waiting for breakdowns.
Conclusion (100 words)
The choice isn't between jobs and nature-it's between short-term thinking and long-term prosperity. Every dollar spent protecting species saves ten in future losses, from collapsed fisheries to flood disasters. Endangered species aren't just pretty animals-they're vital cogs in systems that feed us, heal us, and protect our homes. As climate change accelerates, these natural defenses become more valuable than ever. True fiscal responsibility means investing wisely in our planet's life support systems today, rather than paying catastrophic bills tomorrow. Conservation isn't an expense we can't afford-it's savings we can't afford to lose.