Last visit was: 16 Sep 2026, 01:04 It is currently 16 Sep 2026, 01:04

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 07 Jun 2014
Posts: 4815
Own Kudos [?]: 12311 [8]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q167 V156
WE:Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2015
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jan 2026
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: GRE RC #18-insects can function as pollinators of cycads [#permalink]
Please correct the answers

Posted from my mobile device
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36149
Own Kudos [?]: 43318 [1]
Given Kudos: 27243
Send PM
Re: GRE RC #18-insects can function as pollinators of cycads [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Question 1: Answer E
The passage states: "many male cycad cones are comparatively small and thus produce far less pollen." This directly links cone size to pollen quantity - smaller cones produce less pollen.
- (B) is a trap - the passage discusses how much pollen is produced, not the mechanism of release (which is wind for all cones regardless of size).
- (A) and (C) aren't addressed in relation to cone size at all.
- (D) is about insect attraction, a separate topic altogether.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36149
Own Kudos [?]: 43318 [1]
Given Kudos: 27243
Send PM
Re: GRE RC #18-insects can function as pollinators of cycads [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Question 2: Answer E
The passage builds a specific tension: male cone structure "is quite consistent with the wind dispersal of pollen," but then states the structure of "most female cycad cones seems inconsistent with direct pollination by wind." This is exactly the structure of answer Emale cones support wind pollination, but that mechanism doesn't fit most female cones.
- (C) is close but too strong - "irresolvable discrepancy" overstates the passage's tone; the passage doesn't claim the tension is unsolvable, just that it exists.
- (D) overstates it as well - the female cone structure doesn't "rule out" wind pollination entirely, since one genus (Cycas) is structurally accessible to wind.
- (A) is wrong - the passage presents competing evidence, not conclusive support for one theory.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36149
Own Kudos [?]: 43318 [1]
Given Kudos: 27243
Send PM
Re: GRE RC #18-insects can function as pollinators of cycads [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Question 3: Answer D
Lines 2-4 argue that cycads removed from their native habitat (and thus from native insects) become infertile - implying insects caused the fertility. But this argument has a hidden gap: transplanted cycads also experience different wind conditions, which could be the real reason for infertility, not the absence of insects.
(D) closes that gap: if the wind conditions in the new habitat are similar to the original habitat, then wind differences can be ruled out as an alternative explanation, making it more likely that the loss of insects specifically caused the infertility - strengthening the insect-pollination argument.
- (E) is a strong-sounding distractor but works differently - it would actually undermine the argument (if insects are still present because they came along accidentally, then insect absence isn't truly the explanation for infertility).
- (A), (B), (C) don't address the wind-vs-insect confound at all.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36149
Own Kudos [?]: 43318 [0]
Given Kudos: 27243
Send PM
Re: GRE RC #18-insects can function as pollinators of cycads [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Question 4: Answer A
The passage says "anecdotal reports of wind pollination in cycads cannot be ignored" - the word "anecdotal" signals that no rigorous/systematic evidence for wind pollination has been established, only informal observations. This matches (A) directly.
- (B) is wrong - the passage never says anecdotal reports were confirmed, only that they "cannot be ignored."
- (C), (D), (E) aren't supported - the passage doesn't describe the history or methodology of the investigations themselves.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: GRE RC #18-insects can function as pollinators of cycads [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
275 posts
GRE Instructor
1151 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne