Last visit was: 13 Apr 2025, 07:39 It is currently 13 Apr 2025, 07:39
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New comers' posts
New posts
Unanswered

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
PREVIOUS TOPIC
NEXT TOPIC

In private litigation, an employer can be (1) $\qquad$ for the acts pe

Tags :
Find Similar Topics  About  Add a Tag

Show Tags
Hide Tags

User avatar
D
Carcass
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31546
Own Kudos [?]: 37744 [1]
Given Kudos: 26238
Send PM
In private litigation, an employer can be (1) $\qquad$ for the acts pe [#permalink] New post   06 Apr 2025, 01:53
Expert Reply
1
Bookmarks
00:00

Question Stats:

33% (01:30) correct 66% (00:50) wrong based on 3 sessions

Hide Show timer Statistics

In private litigation, an employer can be (i) $\(\qquad\)$ for the acts performed by employees during the discharge of their duties. Such (ii) $\(\qquad\)$ founded on the assumption that the superior has power over the actions of the subordinates. In other words, it is presumed that the superior has the duty to control (iii) $\(\qquad\)$ .


Blank (i) Blank (ii) Blank (iii)
A. inadvertently appreciated D. misconceptions are G. all litigants
B. surely redeemed E. vicarious liability is H. the raconteur
C. held responsible F. objective criteria is I. every transgression



ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C,E,I
User avatar
D
Carcass
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31546
Own Kudos [?]: 37744 [0]
Given Kudos: 26238
Send PM
Re: In private litigation, an employer can be (1) $\qquad$ for the acts pe [#permalink] New post   10 Apr 2025, 04:00
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


The second sentence of the text provides the clue to the missing words in both blank 1 and blank 2 . The second sentence puts forth the assumption that the employer has power over the actions of the subordinates. This suggests that 'held responsible' fits in blank 1 and 'vicarious liability' (because the employer is indirectly held responsible for the acts of the employees) best fits in blank 2. Finally, the overall tone of the text suggests that 'every transgression' is apt in blank 3. Thus, the answer is C, E, I.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
gmatclubot
Re: In private litigation, an employer can be (1) $\qquad$ for the acts pe [#permalink]
10 Apr 2025, 04:00
Moderators:
bronaugust
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
VibhuAnurag
GRE Instructor
234 posts
HarishKumar
GRE Instructor
1071 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Main navigation

Partners

GRE Resources

www.ets.org/gre | About | Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy | Prep Club for GRE Rules | Contact