Last visit was: 15 Sep 2026, 17:09 It is currently 15 Sep 2026, 17:09

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36149
Own Kudos [?]: 43317 [1]
Given Kudos: 27243
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Dec 2025
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [3]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: It is telling that a politician long adept at inhabiting any role [#permalink]
>It is telling that a politician long adept at inhabiting any role that will serve his immediate purpose has been able to

If he's able to "easily placate" an audience then how would it be "telling"? It shouldn't come as a surprise as the politician is very "adept at inhabiting any role that will serve his immediate purpose"

Shouldn't "only repel" be a better fit? If a politician who can so readily take on any role is not able to convince an audience, then it comes as a surprise. And this speaks more about the "fickle" nature of his audience than about his persuasive skills.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36149
Own Kudos [?]: 43317 [0]
Given Kudos: 27243
Send PM
Re: It is telling that a politician long adept at inhabiting any role [#permalink]
Expert Reply
zixZIXzix wrote:
>It is telling that a politician long adept at inhabiting any role that will serve his immediate purpose has been able to

If he's able to "easily placate" an audience then how would it be "telling"? It shouldn't come as a surprise as the politician is very "adept at inhabiting any role that will serve his immediate purpose"

Shouldn't "only repel" be a better fit? If a politician who can so readily take on any role is not able to convince an audience, then it comes as a surprise. And this speaks more about the "fickle" nature of his audience than about his persuasive skills.


To be hoinest I think as well. B should be the answer
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jan 2026
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: It is telling that a politician long adept at inhabiting any role [#permalink]
Carcass wrote:
zixZIXzix wrote:
>It is telling that a politician long adept at inhabiting any role that will serve his immediate purpose has been able to

If he's able to "easily placate" an audience then how would it be "telling"? It shouldn't come as a surprise as the politician is very "adept at inhabiting any role that will serve his immediate purpose"

Shouldn't "only repel" be a better fit? If a politician who can so readily take on any role is not able to convince an audience, then it comes as a surprise. And this speaks more about the "fickle" nature of his audience than about his persuasive skills.


To be hoinest I think as well. B should be the answer


I think when B becomes the answer, then it doesn't match with G-persuasive because that would mean the politician failed to persuade the electorate.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36149
Own Kudos [?]: 43317 [0]
Given Kudos: 27243
Send PM
Re: It is telling that a politician long adept at inhabiting any role [#permalink]
Expert Reply
This sentence presents a critique of both a politician and the voters. The key is to identify the contrast between the politician's "acting" and his lack of "truthfulness."

1. The Politician's Strategy (Blank i): The opening states he is "adept at inhabiting any role." This means he is a chameleon who changes his persona to win people over. If he is successful at this, he has been able to easily placate (soothe or pacify) an angry (disgruntled) electorate. Only repel would make the sentence illogical, and shrewdly is an adverb that lacks a necessary verb in this construction.

2. The Voters' Flaw (Blank ii): Why would an angry electorate be so easily calmed by someone they know is just "playing a role"? It suggests they change their minds or loyalties very easily. Therefore, their nature is fickle. Docile (submissive) doesn't fit because they started as "disgruntled," and disaffected is simply a synonym for disgruntled, which doesn't explain why they were so easily calmed.

3. The Missing Quality (Blank iii): The sentence concludes that this success speaks more to the voters' flightiness than to the politician's ability to be candid (honest/straightforward). Since the politician "inhabits roles," his opposite would be someone who is truthful. Persuasive and misleading are actually things the politician is already doing; the sentence is looking for the "virtue" he is pretending to have.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: It is telling that a politician long adept at inhabiting any role [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
275 posts
GRE Instructor
1151 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne