Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
Literature from the Midwestern United States is often relegated
[#permalink]
20 May 2025, 08:26
Expert Reply
Question 1
00:00
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Is your answer correct? Yes No Not Sure
Question 2
00:00
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
100% (01:28) wrong based on 1 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
A
B
C
Literature from the Midwestern United States is often relegated to the periphery of the American canon. Jon A. Lauck, in his book From Warm Center to Ragged Edge, attributes this marginalization to a statement of literary critic Carl Van Doren published in The Nation in 1921, during a period when the hierarchies of aesthetic and social values to be embodied by the canon were first delineated. Van Doren described the most interesting literature from the middle of the United States as that which could be characterized as a "revolt from the village." He celebrated authors who portrayed local life as stifling rather than satisfying and considered them artistic innovators and political visionaries. Lauck argues that Van Doren and other Eastern critics not only completely ignored Midwestern writers whose work deviated from this pattern but also substantially misunderstood the work of the writers who had been assigned to the "revolt" school, resulting in the exclusion of most Midwestern works from the "rootless, urban, elite version of American literature that persists to this day." Although she finds Lauck's omission of a definition of "the Midwest" troubling, Stephanie Foote considers his book "a triumph of research . . . and a compelling narrative" that provokes the reader to "take seriously the debates about which cultures are valued and which are not."
Select the sentence that provides Lauck's opinion of Van Doren's assessment of Midwestern literature.
"Lauck argues that Van Doren and other Eastern critics not only completely ignored Midwestern writers whose work who deviated from this pattern but also substantially misunderstood the work of the writers who had been assigned to the 'revolt' school, resulting in the exclusion of most Midwestern works from the "rootless, urban, elite version of American literature that persists to this day.'"
Consider each of the following choices separately and select all that apply.
Which of the following statements about the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school can be inferred from the passage?
(A) Jon Lauck believes that some of the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school were misread by Eastern critics. (B) When the American canon of literature was first discussed, some critics considered the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school the most important literature from that region. (C) Stephanie Foote finds Lauck's omission of a definition of "the Midwest" sufficient to dismiss his assessment of the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school.