Re: Literature from the Midwestern United States is often relegated
[#permalink]
31 May 2025, 09:54
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION QUESTION #2
A, B
(A) is supported by Lauck's opinion expressed in the fifth sentence and is correct. If the works were "misunderstood," then they were "misread." (B) is also correct. This choice is supported by the third sentence, where it's said that Van Doren, one of the critics responsible for the discussions that led to the formation of the American canon of literature, called these works "the most interesting literature from the middle of the United States." Since a canon of literature is a list of the most important or influential books, and since Van Doren's comment is cited in reference to the creation of the American canon, it is inferred that "Van Doren and other Eastern critics" thought the works of the "revolt" school were the most important literature from the Midwestern United States. (C) is not supported by the text. While Foote does criticize Lauck's omission of a crucial definition, she also considers Lauck's book "a triumph of research" and so likely supports his assessment of these works. Her criticism is directed toward an issue that is peripheral to the literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school.