Re: Martin Luther King, Jr. was more than is commonly thought tod
[#permalink]
02 Feb 2025, 13:29
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
Radical, immoderate.
There is a contrast between what Martin Luther King, Jr. was really like and how he is generally perceived today. The sentence contains two important clues. First, he went through a "process of canonization" posthumously (after his death), meaning that he was turned into a saintlike figure in the popular imagination. Second, during the process, his "more palatable" (pleasing or easy to agree with) "and less far-reaching political and social visions became prominent." It must be true, then, that he had less palatable, more far-reaching visions that are now overlooked. The word in the blank should mean something like revolutionary or boundary-pushing. "Radical" and "immoderate" both fit this meaning. Ineffective," "politic" (sensible), "incongruous" (not in harmony with the surroundings), and "raucous" (very loud or harsh) do not fit the required meaning.