GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 28Live Online Class with Top GRE Expert Mike Butville
08:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GRE course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP GRE OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon/Wed Sept. 28, 2026 - Dec. 9, 2026, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
Martin Luther King, Jr. was more than is commonly thought tod
[#permalink]
26 Dec 2024, 12:01
26 Dec 2024, 12:01
Expert Reply
00:00
Question Stats:
29% (00:58) correct
70% (01:42) wrong based on 17 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Martin Luther King, Jr. was more $\(\qquad\)$ than is commonly thought today; it was only in the posthumous process of canonization that his more palatable, less far-reaching political and social visions became prominent.
| Two Answers |
|---|
| A. ineffective |
| B. radical |
| C. politic | D. immoderate | E. incongruous |
| F. raucous |
Re: Martin Luther King, Jr. was more than is commonly thought tod
[#permalink]
02 Feb 2025, 13:29
02 Feb 2025, 13:29
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
Radical, immoderate.
There is a contrast between what Martin Luther King, Jr. was really like and how he is generally perceived today. The sentence contains two important clues. First, he went through a "process of canonization" posthumously (after his death), meaning that he was turned into a saintlike figure in the popular imagination. Second, during the process, his "more palatable" (pleasing or easy to agree with) "and less far-reaching political and social visions became prominent." It must be true, then, that he had less palatable, more far-reaching visions that are now overlooked. The word in the blank should mean something like revolutionary or boundary-pushing. "Radical" and "immoderate" both fit this meaning. Ineffective," "politic" (sensible), "incongruous" (not in harmony with the surroundings), and "raucous" (very loud or harsh) do not fit the required meaning.
Radical, immoderate.
There is a contrast between what Martin Luther King, Jr. was really like and how he is generally perceived today. The sentence contains two important clues. First, he went through a "process of canonization" posthumously (after his death), meaning that he was turned into a saintlike figure in the popular imagination. Second, during the process, his "more palatable" (pleasing or easy to agree with) "and less far-reaching political and social visions became prominent." It must be true, then, that he had less palatable, more far-reaching visions that are now overlooked. The word in the blank should mean something like revolutionary or boundary-pushing. "Radical" and "immoderate" both fit this meaning. Ineffective," "politic" (sensible), "incongruous" (not in harmony with the surroundings), and "raucous" (very loud or harsh) do not fit the required meaning.
gmatclubot
Re: Martin Luther King, Jr. was more than is commonly thought tod [#permalink]
02 Feb 2025, 13:29
Moderators:
