Re: One theorist contends that the insights gleaned from literary engageme
[#permalink]
25 Apr 2026, 04:00
1. The Logic Structure :
- The Logic Gate: The colon (:) indicates that the second half of the sentence explains the first. The key phrase is "resist formal linguistic categorization," which means these insights are hard—or impossible—to put into words.
- The Progression: The phrase "and perhaps even" suggests a step up in intensity. Blank (ii) should be a stronger version of Blank (i).
- Inference for Blank (i): If something resists categorization or is hard to pin down, it is elusive.
- Inference for Blank (ii): If the difficulty of expression is extreme (the "perhaps even" step), we need a word that means "completely beyond words." That word is ineffable.
- Selection: Elusive (B) and Ineffable (E).
2. Evaluating the Choices :
- A. lucrative: (Thematic Trap) Means producing a great deal of profit. While literature can be valuable, "profit" has no logical link to "resisting linguistic categorization."
- B. elusive: (Correct) Difficult to find, catch, or achieve; in this context, difficult to define or express clearly.
- C. didactic: (Category Trap) Intended to teach, particularly in having moral instruction as an ulterior motive. This describes the intent of literature, but not the nature of the insights described in the clue.
- D. pedestrian: (Opposite Trap) Lacking inspiration or excitement; dull. This contradicts the idea of literature providing "perceptual nuances."
- E. ineffable: (Correct) Too great or extreme to be expressed or described in words. This is the perfect high-intensity follow-up to elusive.
- F. speculative: (Logic Trap) Engaged in, expressing, or based on conjecture rather than knowledge. While literary theory is often speculative, the clue is about the indescribable nature of the learning, not its uncertainty.