sanya3005 wrote:
HarishKumar wrote:
The recent Lowbrow art movement of Los Angeles has inarguable (i)___________. Original works by artists such as Mark Ryden, once only collected by a select few, have now garnered greater (ii)___________and often sell for tens of thousands of dollars at auction. The movement’s detractors need not be surprised, then, that more people are clamoring for these works to (iii)___________more classic pieces at galleries and museums.
The phrases:
and often sell for tens of thousands of dollars at auction
that more people are clamoring for these works
imply that original works by artists such as Mark Ryden have now garnered greater approbation.
And since these works have now garnered greater approbation and often sell for tens of thousands of dollars at auction, we can be sure that the Lowbrow art movement of Los Angeles has inarguable esteem. There is nothing to suggest panache - dash or flamboyance in style or action.
And again, since these works have now garnered greater approbation, more people are clamouring for these works to supplant more classic pieces at galleries and museums.
Why not panache in first blank????An art exhibition which hosts works which have gained great approbation will garner great appreciation. And thus it has certainly gone up in the
esteem of others. But we cannot say that it has gained in flamboyance and style (
panache). How does great appreciation for its art works translate into flamboyance or
panache for the museum?