Last visit was: 22 Dec 2024, 04:39 It is currently 22 Dec 2024, 04:39

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30460
Own Kudos [?]: 36814 [1]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2024
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30460
Own Kudos [?]: 36814 [0]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30460
Own Kudos [?]: 36814 [1]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Re: The precipitate rise in the incidence of type 1 , [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION QUESTION #2


This is an application question. Both choices A and E would strengthen the correlation, so they should be eliminated. Choice B should also be eliminated because, among other reasons, the question refers to a single data set. Choice C is also incorrect because the cited forms of stress do fall under the category of psychological stress. Even though the incidence of type 1 diabetes is rising at a slower rate among children who are not overweight, it is still rising; therefore, choice D undercuts or weakens the correlation between being overweight and developing the disease. Remember, the phrase "if it were true" signals that you're looking for an answer that isn't true. Think of it as another kind of "EXCEPT" or "NOT" question.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30460
Own Kudos [?]: 36814 [0]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Re: The precipitate rise in the incidence of type 1 , [#permalink]
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION QUESTION #3


The sentence makes a general statement that questions the logic of how the conclusions previously stated in the passage were reached. It is not specific enough to serve as evidence to actually argue against those conclusions, so choice A is not the best answer. It certainly does not support those conclusions either, so choice B is incorrect.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30460
Own Kudos [?]: 36814 [1]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Re: The precipitate rise in the incidence of type 1 , [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
mellowmev wrote:
Carcass please explain question 2 and 3

I am also having a hard time with questions like 2 and 3 in the passage, can you please suggest:
1. video/text to read to improve at these and understand
2. set of practice questions



HERE ALL YOU NEED https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/shorte ... 33410.html

Notice how a weaken question is still a sort of inference question

let me know if you need further help

Ask. I will be happy to assist you
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: The precipitate rise in the incidence of type 1 , [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1066 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne