Last visit was: 09 Apr 2025, 21:32 It is currently 09 Apr 2025, 21:32

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31517
Own Kudos [?]: 37712 [1]
Given Kudos: 26236
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31517
Own Kudos [?]: 37712 [1]
Given Kudos: 26236
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2024
Posts: 103
Own Kudos [?]: 36 [0]
Given Kudos: 44
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31517
Own Kudos [?]: 37712 [0]
Given Kudos: 26236
Send PM
Re: The precipitate rise in the incidence of type 1 , [#permalink]
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION QUESTION #1


Like many of the questions on the GRE ${ }^{\circledR}$ General Test, this question is about main idea and supporting details. The passage implies that scientists have most consistently explored weight gain as a cause of type 1 diabetes; weight gain is most commonly and consistently linked with the rise in incidence. While scientists have found that the increased incidence correlates with this rise, not that it causes the disease, this idea nevertheless constitutes a causation hypothesis, choice A. Choice B can be eliminated because this paragraph is informational; there is no implied argument. The passage does not state or imply anything about a healthful diet, so choice C is incorrect. Choice D is also incorrect because the passage clearly states that psychological stress, increased wealth, increased levels of hygiene, and infant formula have all been linked either to the rise in incidence or to the decrease in average age of onset of the disease. The passage does not cast doubt on any studies, so choice E is also wrong.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31517
Own Kudos [?]: 37712 [0]
Given Kudos: 26236
Send PM
Re: The precipitate rise in the incidence of type 1 , [#permalink]
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION QUESTION #3


The sentence makes a general statement that questions the logic of how the conclusions previously stated in the passage were reached. It is not specific enough to serve as evidence to actually argue against those conclusions, so choice A is not the best answer. It certainly does not support those conclusions either, so choice B is incorrect.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31517
Own Kudos [?]: 37712 [1]
Given Kudos: 26236
Send PM
Re: The precipitate rise in the incidence of type 1 , [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
mellowmev wrote:
Carcass please explain question 2 and 3

I am also having a hard time with questions like 2 and 3 in the passage, can you please suggest:
1. video/text to read to improve at these and understand
2. set of practice questions



HERE ALL YOU NEED https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/shorte ... 33410.html

Notice how a weaken question is still a sort of inference question

let me know if you need further help

Ask. I will be happy to assist you
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: The precipitate rise in the incidence of type 1 , [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1071 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne