Quote:
There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts - especially at a great cost in money and jobs - to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
**Introduction (100 words)** The idea that we shouldn't pour money into saving endangered species misses the point—our survival is tied to biodiversity in so many ways. Sure, concerns about costs are valid, but they overlook the bigger economic and ecological damage we face if we let these species go extinct. Protecting at-risk plants and animals isn't just a nice thing to do; it's a matter of keeping ourselves safe. From securing our food supply to reducing natural disasters, conservation efforts give us way more back than we invest. This essay will show how protecting species helps our economy, protects our health, and can be done affordably with smart strategies.
**Economic Necessity of Conservation (200 words)** It’s clear that saving species makes financial sense when we think about ecosystem services—the natural benefits we get for free from a healthy environment. Take pollinators like bees and butterflies, for example—they create over \$200 billion a year for global agriculture by helping crops grow. If these pollinators vanish, farmers would have to spend a fortune on artificial pollination or risk total harvest failures. And don't forget about mangroves! These forests not only support endangered species but also protect coastal cities from hurricanes and floods, saving about \$80 billion yearly from avoided damages.
The fishing industry shows how cutting corners can really backfire. Canada’s Atlantic cod fishery crashed in the 1990s from years of overfishing, which wiped out 40,000 jobs and cost \$2.5 billion. On the flip side, sustainable management of Alaskan salmon fisheries has kept fish populations and fishing jobs steady for years. These examples prove that conservation isn’t just an expense—it’s actually a safeguard against much bigger financial disasters.
**Health and Safety Impacts (200 words)** Beyond money, biodiversity has a surprising role in keeping us healthy. Did you know that around half of all modern medicines come from wild plants and animals? From cancer treatments sourced from rainforest plants to painkillers made from cone snails, the potential for medical breakthroughs is huge. When we lose these species, we might miss out on cures forever. For instance, the gastric brooding frog became extinct in the 1980s, and it had the potential to change ulcer treatments thanks to its unique biology.
Also, ecological balance is crucial for controlling diseases. Take North America’s bats; with their decline, mosquito populations have soared, leading to increased risks of illnesses like West Nile virus. In Africa, by preserving lion habitats, we can manage antelope populations—preventing overgrazing that could turn fertile land into desert. These scenarios show that keeping species around is vital for public health—damaging ecosystems makes us more susceptible to diseases and food shortages.
**Smart, Affordable Protection Strategies (200 words)** Modern conservation has come a long way from being expensive and rigid. For instance, Costa Rica’s “Payments for Ecosystem Services” program rewards landowners for taking care of forests, costing 60% less than the old-style parks while doubling tree cover. Technology is also cutting down costs—drones and AI can now help monitor wildlife areas without breaking the bank.
Some solutions even make money. Ecotourism in African reserves provides more jobs than poaching ever could—like in Rwanda, which rakes in \$500 million a year from gorilla tourism. Plus, “debt-for-nature” swaps permit countries to reduce their national debt while funding conservation efforts—a strategy that has safeguarded over 50 million acres around the globe.
The best way to save money is to prevent problems before they start. Restoring the Florida Everglades after all the damage will cost \$20 billion—ten times the amount needed for proactive protection. Just like keeping a car maintained is way cheaper than waiting for it to break down, preserving ecosystems regularly costs a lot less than handling the fallout later.
**Conclusion (100 words)** The choice isn’t between jobs and nature; it’s really about choosing between short-term thinking and long-term benefits. Every dollar we put into saving species can save us ten down the line, whether it’s from collapsed fisheries or natural disasters. Endangered species are more than just pretty animals; they’re key parts of the systems that feed us, heal us, and protect our homes. With climate change speeding up, these natural defenses are becoming even more valuable. Real financial responsibility means making smart investments in the planet’s life support systems today instead of facing costly bills tomorrow. Conservation isn’t something we can’t afford; it’s savings we really can’t afford to lose.