Last visit was: 04 Nov 2024, 22:49 It is currently 04 Nov 2024, 22:49
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New comers' posts
New posts
Unanswered

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
PREVIOUS TOPIC
NEXT TOPIC

Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags :
Find Similar Topics  About  Add a Tag

Show Tags
Hide Tags

User avatar
soumya1989
Director
Director
Joined: 16 May 2014
Posts: 592
Own Kudos [?]: 2037 [14]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q165 V161
Send PM
Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was [#permalink] New post   07 Jan 2016, 05:31
9
Expert Reply
5
Bookmarks
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

81% (02:01) correct 19% (02:22) wrong based on 162 sessions

Hide Show timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

Question Stats:

79% (01:02) correct 21% (01:35) wrong based on 128 sessions

Hide Show timer Statistics

Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was not a fluid, egalitarian society where individual wealth and poverty were ephemeral conditions. At least so argues E. Pessen in his iconoclastic study of the very rich in the United States between 1825 and 1850.

Pessen does present a quantity of examples, together with some refreshingly intelligible statistics, to establish the existence of an inordinately wealthy class. Though active in commerce or the professions, most of the wealthy were not self-made but had inherited family fortunes. In no sense mercurial, these great fortunes survived the financial panics that destroyed lesser ones. Indeed, in several cities the wealthiest one percent constantly increased its share until by 1850 it owned half of the community’s wealth. Although these observations are true, Pessen overestimates their importance by concluding from them that the undoubted progress toward inequality in the late eighteenth century continued in the Jacksonian period and that the United States was a class-ridden, plutocratic society even before industrialization.


4. According to the passage, Pessen indicates that all of the following were true of the very wealthy in the United States between 1825 and 1850 EXCEPT:

A) They formed a distinct upper class.
B) Many of them were able to increase their holdings.
C) Some of them worked as professionals or in business.
D) Most of them accumulated their own fortunes.
E) Many of them retained their wealth in spite of financial upheavals.



5. Which of the following best states the author’s main point?

A) Pessen’s study has overturned the previously established view of the social and economic structure of early-nineteenth-century America.
B) Tocqueville’s analysis of the United States in the Jacksonian era remains the definitive account of this period.
C) Pessen’s study is valuable primarily because it shows the continuity of the social system in the United States throughout the nineteenth century.
D) The social patterns and political power of the extremely wealthy in the United States between 1825 and 1850 are well documented.
E) Pessen challenges a view of the social and economic systems in the United States from 1825 to 1850, but he draws conclusions that are incorrect.




Practice Questions
Question: 4,5
Page: 65
Difficulty: Medium
ShowHide Answer Question #1
Official Answer
D
ShowHide Answer Question #2
Official Answer
E
Most Helpful Community Reply
User avatar
Gladiator59
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 81 [10]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was [#permalink] New post   30 Jan 2019, 22:38
9
1
Bookmarks
A short but very troublesome passage as it is difficult to understand. Nevertheless, the flow of thought is palpable.

Detail question and can be found in the middle of the passage.
According to the passage, Pessen indicates that all of the following were true of the very wealthy in the United States between 1825 and 1850 EXCEPT:
(A)They formed a distinct upper class. Mentioned in the passage. Top 1%'s wealth was not ephemeral (meaning short-lived) and hence they were distinct.
(B)Many of them were able to increase their holdings. Also, verbatim from the passage.
(C)Some of them worked as professionals or in business. This is also mentioned in the passage - "Though active in commerce or the professions, most of"
(D)Most of them accumulated their own fortunes. Perfect - Pessen states that the fortunes were mostly accumulated and hereditary and not earned by them.
(E)Many of them retained their wealth in spite of financial upheavals. Also mentioned.

Tricky because some of the words in the options can confuse those whose first language is not English. Also, the author ends with stating that Pessen though did make correct observations his conclusions were not on point.
The author's attitude toward Pessen's presentation of statistics can be best described as
(A) disapproving TRAP - this focusses only on the latter half of the last conclusion. However, the entire passage focusses on how the observations made by Pessen's study were true. VERY TRICKY!
(B) shocked Out of scope. No reason to suspect shock.
(C) suspicious Again, same as above.
(D) amused Again, why would the author be amused? Discard.
(E) laudatory Purely out of the process of elimination as well as the fact that the author has spent the entire passage in describing the theory by Pessen the author surely does agree with the observations. Hence this is the correct choice. Tricky.


Need to know the meaning of the word "iconoclastic" - which means challenging the set principles. Also, the opening line is a giveaway that Pessen is stating that someone is wrong. Next, the author does agree that Pessen's observations were right on, but goes on to say that the conclusions drawn from them were overestimations and hence incorrect.
Which of the following best states the author's main point?
(A) Pessen's study has overturned the previously established view of the social and economic structure of early nineteenth-century America. Too extreme to be the main point. Also, does not capture the essence of the passage.
(B) Tocqueville's analysis of the United States in the Jacksonian era remains the definitive account of this period. 180 Opposite of what is mentioned in the passage. The first line is evidence for it. :-)
(C) Pessen's study is valuable primarily because it shows the continuity of the social system in the United States throughout the nineteenth century. Again, 180 opposite of main idea.
(D) The social patterns and political power of the extremely wealthy in the United States between 1825 and 1850 are well documented. TRAP - they are well documented but this is not the full picture. Hence not the main point.
(E) Pessen challenges a view of the social and economic system in the United States from 1825 to 1850, but he draws conclusions that are incorrect. Perfect - this is exactly what we are looking for.

Hope answers are helpful. :-)
General Discussion
User avatar
soumya1989
Director
Director
Joined: 16 May 2014
Posts: 592
Own Kudos [?]: 2037 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q165 V161
Send PM
Re: Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was [#permalink] New post   07 Jan 2016, 05:33
3
Expert Reply

Explanation


1. D
For this question, you are to identify the one statement that CANNOT be correctly attributed to Pessen. Therefore, you must first determine which of the statements given
can be attributed to Pessen. According to the passage, Pessen maintains all of the following: there was a class of “inordinately wealthy” Americans (Choice A); in some
places that class “constantly increased its share” (Choice B); its members were “active in commerce or the professions” (Choice C); and “these great fortunes survived the
financial panics that destroyed lesser ones” (Choice E). However, Pessen also maintains, in contradiction to Choice D, that “most of the wealthy were not self-made but
had inherited family fortunes.” Therefore, Choice D is correct.

2. E
It is important to realize that although most of the passage is devoted to describing Pessen’s study, the author’s main point is to criticize the conclusion Pessen draws.
Choices A, C, and D omit any reference to the author’s critical evaluation of Pessen’s study, and hence are not statements of the author’s main point. Choice B is also incorrect.
Because Pessen criticizes Tocqueville and the author criticizes Pessen, it might seem that the author’s main point is to defend Tocqueville’s analysis. However, the passage
does not indicate that Tocqueville’s analysis is definitive. Choice E is correct. According to the first paragraph, Pessen challenges Tocqueville’s view, but according to
the second paragraph, Pessen’s conclusions are incorrect.
avatar
AE
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Posts: 505
Own Kudos [?]: 133 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2019, 20:25
Any explanation please?
User avatar
G
HarishKumar
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1063
Own Kudos [?]: 1421 [2]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was [#permalink] New post   14 Aug 2019, 23:15
2
Question - 1 - According to the passage, Pessen indicates that all of the following were true of the very wealthy in the United States between 1825 and 1850 EXCEPT:

Choice D - Most of them accumulated their own fortunes. CORRECT

The passage clearly states that:

Though active in commerce or the professions, most of the wealthy were not self-made but had inherited family fortunes.


Choice A - They formed a distinct upper class. WRONG

This is wrong because the passage states -

Pessen does present a quantity of examples, together with some refreshingly intelligible statistics, to establish the existence of an inordinately wealthy class

Indeed, in several cities the wealthiest one percent constantly increased its share until by 1850 it owned half of the community’s wealth.


Choice B - Many of them were able to increase their holdings. WRONG

This is wrong because the passage states that:

Indeed, in several cities the wealthiest one percent constantlyincreased its shareuntil by 1850 it owned half of the community’s wealth.


Choice C - Some of them worked as professionals or in business. WRONG

This is wrong because the passage states that:

Though active in commerce or the professions, most of the wealthy were not self-made but had inherited family fortunes.



Choice E - Many of them retained their wealth in spite of financial upheavals. WRONG

This is wrong because the passage states that:

In no sense mercurial, these great fortunes survived the financial panics that destroyed lesser ones.



Question - 2 - Which of the following best states the author’s main point?

Choice E - Pessen challenges a view of the social and economic systems in the United States from 1825 to 1850, but he draws conclusions that are incorrect. CORRECT

The author clearly mentions in the last sentences that E.Pessen draws wrong conclusions on the basis of correct data

Although these observations are true, Pessen overestimates their importance by concluding from them that the undoubted progress toward inequality in the late eighteenth century continued in the Jacksonian period and that the United States was a class-ridden, plutocratic society even before industrialization.

Choice A - Pessen’s study has overturned the previously established view of the social and economic structure of early-nineteenth-century America. WRONG

Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong.

Clearly the author does not consider Pessen as having overturned (too extreme a word) the previously established view of the social and economic structure of early-nineteenth-century America. The extreme word overturned is red flag worth considering.

"At least so argues E. Pessen..."

again proves that the author himself does not subscribe to Pessen's view.


Choice B - Tocqueville’s analysis of the United States in the Jacksonian era remains the definitive account of this period. WRONG

The fact that the author disagrees with Pessen's conclusions does not mean that he supports Tocqueville (I like the name). Also definitive is too strong a word and is a red flag.

Plus, this is not the main point.

Choice - C - Pessen’s study is valuable primarily because it shows the continuity of the social system in the United States throughout the nineteenth century. WRONG

The author in fact disagrees with this conclusion and says that " Pessen overestimates their (true observations) importance" in concluding that "that the undoubted progress toward inequality in the late eighteenth century continued in the Jacksonian period and that the United States was a class-ridden, plutocratic society even before industrialization."

Plus, this is not the main point.

Choice D - The social patterns and political power of the extremely wealthy in the United States between 1825 and 1850 are well documented. WRONG

Pessen does present a quantity of examples, together with some refreshingly intelligible statistics, to establish the existence of an inordinately wealthy class.

Thus he presents only a quantity of examples, and we cannot conclude on this basis that they were "well documented".

Also, well document is an extreme phrase and should trigger the red flags in you.

Plus, this is not the main point.
User avatar
D
Carcass
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29887
Own Kudos [?]: 36114 [1]
Given Kudos: 25918
Send PM
Re: Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was [#permalink] New post   20 Oct 2022, 15:25
1
Expert Reply
HarishKumar wrote:
Question - 1 - According to the passage, Pessen indicates that all of the following were true of the very wealthy in the United States between 1825 and 1850 EXCEPT:

Choice D - Most of them accumulated their own fortunes. CORRECT

The passage clearly states that:

Though active in commerce or the professions, most of the wealthy were not self-made but had inherited family fortunes.


Choice A - They formed a distinct upper class. WRONG

This is wrong because the passage states -

Pessen does present a quantity of examples, together with some refreshingly intelligible statistics, to establish the existence of an inordinately wealthy class

Indeed, in several cities the wealthiest one percent constantly increased its share until by 1850 it owned half of the community’s wealth.


Choice B - Many of them were able to increase their holdings. WRONG

This is wrong because the passage states that:

Indeed, in several cities the wealthiest one percent constantlyincreased its shareuntil by 1850 it owned half of the community’s wealth.


Choice C - Some of them worked as professionals or in business. WRONG

This is wrong because the passage states that:

Though active in commerce or the professions, most of the wealthy were not self-made but had inherited family fortunes.



Choice E - Many of them retained their wealth in spite of financial upheavals. WRONG

This is wrong because the passage states that:

In no sense mercurial, these great fortunes survived the financial panics that destroyed lesser ones.



Question - 2 - Which of the following best states the author’s main point?

Choice E - Pessen challenges a view of the social and economic systems in the United States from 1825 to 1850, but he draws conclusions that are incorrect. CORRECT

The author clearly mentions in the last sentences that E.Pessen draws wrong conclusions on the basis of correct data

Although these observations are true, Pessen overestimates their importance by concluding from them that the undoubted progress toward inequality in the late eighteenth century continued in the Jacksonian period and that the United States was a class-ridden, plutocratic society even before industrialization.

Choice A - Pessen’s study has overturned the previously established view of the social and economic structure of early-nineteenth-century America. WRONG

Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong.

Clearly the author does not consider Pessen as having overturned (too extreme a word) the previously established view of the social and economic structure of early-nineteenth-century America. The extreme word overturned is red flag worth considering.

"At least so argues E. Pessen..."

again proves that the author himself does not subscribe to Pessen's view.


Choice B - Tocqueville’s analysis of the United States in the Jacksonian era remains the definitive account of this period. WRONG

The fact that the author disagrees with Pessen's conclusions does not mean that he supports Tocqueville (I like the name). Also definitive is too strong a word and is a red flag.

Plus, this is not the main point.

Choice - C - Pessen’s study is valuable primarily because it shows the continuity of the social system in the United States throughout the nineteenth century. WRONG

The author in fact disagrees with this conclusion and says that " Pessen overestimates their (true observations) importance" in concluding that "that the undoubted progress toward inequality in the late eighteenth century continued in the Jacksonian period and that the United States was a class-ridden, plutocratic society even before industrialization."

Plus, this is not the main point.

Choice D - The social patterns and political power of the extremely wealthy in the United States between 1825 and 1850 are well documented. WRONG

Pessen does present a quantity of examples, together with some refreshingly intelligible statistics, to establish the existence of an inordinately wealthy class.

Thus he presents only a quantity of examples, and we cannot conclude on this basis that they were "well documented".

Also, well document is an extreme phrase and should trigger the red flags in you.

Plus, this is not the main point.


This is a GREAT explanation!!
User avatar
VerbalBot
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1674
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was [#permalink] New post   14 Jun 2024, 08:33
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Tocqueville, apparently, was wrong. Jacksonian America was [#permalink]
14 Jun 2024, 08:33
Moderators:
bronaugust
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
VibhuAnurag
GRE Instructor
228 posts
HarishKumar
GRE Instructor
1063 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Main navigation

Partners

GRE Resources

www.ets.org/gre | About | Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy | Prep Club for GRE Rules | Contact