Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected behavior in apparently simple equations representing atmospheric air flows. Whenever he reran his model with the same inputs, different outputs resulted—although the model lacked any random elements. Lorenz realized that tiny rounding errors in his analog computer mushroomed over time, leading to erratic results. His findings marked a seminal moment in the development of chaos theory, which, despite its name, has little to do with randomness.
To understand how unpredictability can arise from deterministic equations, which do not involve chance outcomes, consider the non-chaotic system of two poppy seeds placed in a round bowl. As the seeds roll to the bowl's center, a position known as a point attractor, the distance between the seeds shrinks. If, instead, the bowl is flipped over, two seeds placed on top will roll away from each other. Such a system, while still not technically chaotic, enlarges initial differences in position.
Chaotic systems, such as a machine mixing bread dough, are characterized by both attraction and repulsion. As the dough is stretched, folded, and pressed back together, any poppy seeds sprinkled in are intermixed seemingly at random. But this randomness is illusory. In fact, the poppy seeds are captured by “strange attractors,” staggeringly complex pathways whose tangles appear accidental but are in fact determined by the system's fundamental equations.
During the dough-kneading process, two poppy seeds positioned next to each other eventually go their separate ways. Any early divergence or measurement error is repeatedly amplified by the mixing until the position of any seed becomes effectively unpredictable. It is this “sensitive dependence on initial conditions” and not true randomness that generates unpredictability in chaotic systems, of which one example may be the Earth's weather. According to the popular interpretation of the “Butterfly Effect,” a butterfly flapping its wings causes hurricanes. A better understanding is that the butterfly causes uncertainty about the precise state of the air. This microscopic uncertainty grows until it encompasses even hurricanes. Few meteorologists believe that we will ever be able to predict rain or shine for a particular day years in the future.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
35% (03:21) correct
65% (03:01) wrong based on 46 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
The main purpose of this passage is to
(A) explore a common misconception about a complex physical system (B) trace the historical development of a scientific theory (C) distinguish a mathematical pattern from its opposite (D) describe the spread of a technical model from one field of study to others (E) contrast possible causes of weather phenomena
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
61% (01:17) correct
39% (01:05) wrong based on 28 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
In the example discussed in the passage, what is true about poppy seeds in bread dough, once the dough has been thoroughly mixed?
(A) They have been individually stretched and folded over, like miniature versions of the entire dough. (B) They are scattered in random clumps throughout the dough. (C) They are accidentally caught in tangled objects called strange attractors. (D) They are bound to regularly dispersed patterns of point attractors. (E) They are in positions dictated by the underlying equations that govern the mixing process.
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
93% (00:38) correct
7% (01:46) wrong based on 30 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
According to the passage, the rounding errors in Lorenz's model
(A) indicated that the model was programmed in a fundamentally faulty way (B) were deliberately included to represent tiny fluctuations in atmospheric air currents (C) were imperceptibly small at first, but tended to grow (D) were at least partially expected, given the complexity of the actual atmosphere (E) shrank to insignificant levels during each trial of the model
Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
40% (01:02) correct
60% (00:39) wrong based on 30 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
The passage mentions each of the following as an example or potential example of a chaotic or non-chaotic system EXCEPT
(A) a dough-mixing machine (B) atmospheric weather patterns (C) poppy seeds placed on top of an upside-down bowl (D) poppy seeds placed in a right-side-up bowl (E) fluctuating butterfly flight patterns
Question 5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
35% (01:03) correct
65% (01:42) wrong based on 31 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following pairs of items would most likely follow typical pathways within a chaotic system?
(A) Two particles ejected in random directions from the same decaying atomic nucleus. (B) Two stickers affixed to a balloon that expands and contracts over and over again. (C) Two avalanches sliding down opposite sides of the same mountain. (D) Two baseballs placed into a device designed to mix paint. (E) Two coins flipped into a large bowl.
Question 6
00:00
A
B
C
Question Stats:
59% (00:47) correct
41% (00:39) wrong based on 39 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
The author implies which of the following about weather systems?
Indicate all that apply.
A. They illustrate the same fundamental phenomenon as Lorenz's rounding errors. B. Experts agree unanimously that weather will never be predictable years in advance. C. They are governed mostly by seemingly trivial events, such as the flapping of a butterfly's wings.
Question 7
00:00
Is your answer correct? Yes No Not Sure
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Select the sentence in the second or third paragraph that illustrates why “chaos theory” might be called a misnomer.
Re: Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected be
[#permalink]
21 Jan 2019, 14:14
1
1
Expert Reply
Quote:
The main purpose of this passage is to
(A) explore a common misconception about a complex physical system (B) trace the historical development of a scientific theory (C) distinguish a mathematical pattern from its opposite (D) describe the spread of a technical model from one field of study to others (E) contrast possible causes of weather phenomena
The answer is in the first sentence of the passage
Quote:
Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected behavior in apparently simple equations representing atmospheric air flows.
A is the right answer
Quote:
In the example discussed in the passage, what is true about poppy seeds in bread dough, once the dough has been thoroughly mixed?
(A) They have been individually stretched and folded over, like miniature versions of the entire dough. (B) They are scattered in random clumps throughout the dough. (C) They are accidentally caught in tangled objects called strange attractors. (D) They are bound to regularly dispersed patterns of point attractors. (E) They are in positions dictated by the underlying equations that govern the mixing process.
We do need an answer that mimics what the passage says
Quote:
staggeringly complex pathways whose tangles appear accidental but are in fact determined by the system's fundamental equations.
Quote:
According to the passage, the rounding errors in Lorenz's model
(A) indicated that the model was programmed in a fundamentally faulty way (B) were deliberately included to represent tiny fluctuations in atmospheric air currents (C) were imperceptibly small at first, but tended to grow (D) were at least partially expected, given the complexity of the actual atmosphere (E) shrank to insignificant levels during each trial of the model
Quote:
Lorenz realized that tiny rounding errors in his analog computer mushroomed over time, leading to erratic results.
Quote:
The passage mentions each of the following as an example or potential example of a chaotic or non-chaotic system EXCEPT
(A) a dough-mixing machine (B) atmospheric weather patterns (C) poppy seeds placed on top of an upside-down bowl (D) poppy seeds placed in a right-side-up bowl (E) fluctuating butterfly flight patterns
E is the only example NOT cited in the passage directly or indirectly.
Quote:
It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following pairs of items would most likely follow typical pathways within a chaotic system?
(A) Two particles ejected in random directions from the same decaying atomic nucleus. (B) Two stickers affixed to a balloon that expands and contracts over and over again. (C) Two avalanches sliding down opposite sides of the same mountain. (D) Two baseballs placed into a device designed to mix paint. (E) Two coins flipped into a large bowl.
Quote:
Chaotic systems, such as a machine mixing bread dough, are characterized by both attraction and repulsion.
Quote:
The author implies which of the following about weather systems?
Indicate all that apply.
They illustrate the same fundamental phenomenon as Lorenz's rounding errors. Experts agree unanimously that weather will never be predictable years in advance. They are governed mostly by seemingly trivial events, such as the flapping of a butterfly's wings.
mushroomed over time - This microscopic uncertainty grows until it encompasses even hurricanes.
Re: Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected be
[#permalink]
10 Feb 2019, 20:58
Can you please explain why doesn't C. (They are governed mostly by seemingly trivial events, such as the flapping of a butterfly's wings) apply for the 6th question ?
Re: Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected be
[#permalink]
14 Feb 2019, 11:52
2
Expert Reply
A better understanding is that the butterfly causes uncertainty about the precise state of the air. This microscopic uncertainty grows until it encompasses even hurricanes
From this part of the passage, you can infer that the butterfly bite is not trivial. It is given to show you a particular effect in terms of future events.
Re: Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected be
[#permalink]
12 Sep 2021, 10:18
1
Expert Reply
Supreeth27112 wrote:
can anyone explain me question 4?why is it not D?
Hi Supreeth27112
From the Passage - According to the popular interpretation of the "Butterfly effect", a butterfly flapping its wings caused hurricanes. A better understanding is that the butterfly causes uncertainty about the precise state of the air.
Now a butterfly flapping its wing is not equal to the "flight path" of the butterfly, the question is deliberately using closely related words handpicked from the passage to use your short term memory against you, but if you slow it down and really read through the options and refer back to the passage, this difference will become clear to you.
Re: Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected be
[#permalink]
09 Jul 2024, 06:40
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
gmatclubot
Re: Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected be [#permalink]