Re: A recent study of an insurance company's underwriters indica
[#permalink]
23 Feb 2019, 20:50
(A) So everyone spends the same amount of time in their work environment? This is more of an assumption than a weakener. It certainly doesn't challenge the conclusion at all.
(B) This strengthens the conclusion.
(C) Aha, this is a good weakener. The argument says that more productive workers are more productive because they have pleasant surroundings. But this choice says that they were good workers even before they received the pleasant surroundings. So being a good worker causes you to have pleasant surroundings, a complete reversal of the idea that having pleasant surroundings causes you to be a good worker.
(D) Again, this is more of an assumption. The opposite claim, that more productive workers do work more hours, would be a weakener, explaining the increased productivity without the nicer space.
(E) This would suggest that unpleasant conditions produce more productivity. But this is false. Hence, this peer pressure must not lead to any increased productivity.