Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
In his Discourse on Inequality, Rousseau posits that early
[#permalink]
Updated on: 26 Jan 2021, 10:01
1
1
Expert Reply
1
Bookmarks
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
In his Discourse on Inequality, Rousseau posits that early social contract theories establish unjust social and political arrangements that provide only the appearance of legitimacy and equality.
In Rousseau’s accounting, the beginnings of the social contract lie in the fears of the rich. In a state of nature, one in which there is no government or law to control the interactions of people, the rich would have great difficulty protecting the property that they possess. Thus, the rich turn to the mechanism of the social contract to shore up the holdings Rousseau views as “hoarded.” The concept of a social contract is appealing to the poor, because the poor fear death in a state of lawlessness and thus seek protection. To obtain assent to the contract, the rich focus their rhetoric on a seeming equality of obligation by creating rules that apply equally to all members of society. This system, however, simply systematizes the “theft” the rich had perpetrated on the poor in the pre-law state of nature.
Rousseau then begins to develop his own vision of a social contract, through which he attempts to right these injustices. His first departure from earlier theorists is in the formation of the sovereign. Rather than members of the state surrendering their rights to another person— an irrational course of action tantamount to surrendering oneself into slavery—they surrender their right to all members of the society and thus to no one. Rousseau refers to this sovereign as the “general will” and it has the task of legislating for the new civil society that is created in the contract.
Unlike early social contract theories, Rousseau’s version conceives of property rights that allow for rights of first occupancy to justify claims, rather than rights of the strongest. In this system, property can be taken only if it has not been previously occupied and only to the degree necessary for the subsistence of those taking it, measures intended as a check to the hoarding of property by force enshrined in earlier contract theory.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
28% (03:42) correct
72% (03:10) wrong based on 39 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
1. Which of the following societies would Rousseau be likely to endorse?
(A) A society in which there is no government or law to control how people interact with each other. (B) A society in which a primary leader is elected through a fair democratic process. (C) A society in which there is only communal property, rather than private property. (D) A society in which the social contract has been dismantled and replaced with rights of first occupancy. (E) A society in which a homeless family could legally move into an empty house they did not purchase.
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
37% (01:42) correct
63% (01:27) wrong based on 38 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
2. It can be inferred from the passage that Rousseau would believe which of the following of a society of men and women living without the primary structures of civilization?
(A) Their wealth would inevitably be equally distributed across the population. (B) Those with more wealth would be at risk of losing it to those with less. (C) Property would not be hoarded by those who had the most power. (D) The social contract would be created in order to protect and support the poor. (E) Property would only be taken if it had not been previously occupied and was necessary for the subsistence of those taking it.
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
84% (00:27) correct
16% (00:49) wrong based on 32 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
3. In the context in which it appears, “subsistence” most nearly means
(A) survival (B) enrichment (C) protection (D) help (E) opposition
Re: In his Discourse on Inequality, Rousseau posits that early
[#permalink]
22 Oct 2021, 03:11
Expert Reply
Official Explanation
1. Which of the following societies would Rousseau be likely to endorse?
Difficulty Level: Very Hard
Explanation
Choice (A) is wrong because Rousseau did argue for a social contract, meaning there should be some kind of law.
Choice (B) is wrong because Rousseau did not think members of a state should surrender their rights to a single person.
Choice (C) is wrong because Rousseau did argue that people could claim property if they needed it, implying the existence of private property in his ideal society.
Choice (D) is wrong because Rousseau did not want to dismantle the social contract entirely, but to replace it with his own ideal social contract.
Choice (E) is the answer because Rousseau desired a society where “property can be taken … to the degree necessary for the subsistence of those taking it.”
Answer: E
void wrote:
1st question please and difference between B and E.
gmatclubot
Re: In his Discourse on Inequality, Rousseau posits that early [#permalink]