17. In the first paragraph, the author mentions McKendrick and Plumb most probably in order to
(A)
contrast their views on the subject of luxury consumerism in eighteenth-century England
The first paragraph is, basically , the introduction to the entire argument of the passage. Moreover, we do not have any contrast in it
(B) indicate the inadequacy of historiographical approaches to eighteenth-century English history
The 1st part does not highlight any approach. it just frames a phenomenon
(C) give examples of historians who have helped to establish the fact of growing consumerism in eighteenth-century England
Correct. we do have examples
(D) support the contention that key questions about eighteenth-century consumerism remain to be answered
it disputes that certain questions were unanswered. This is partially true because we do know that even though certain areas were still unclear, mainly, the reasons for that consumerism was out of the discussion. Tricky
(E) compare one historian's interest in luxury goods such as pottery to another historian's interest in luxury services such as musical festivals
No comparison in the 1st one
18. Which of the following items, if preserved from eighteenth-century England, would provide an example of the kind of documents mentioned?
(A) A written agreement between a supplier of raw materials and a supplier of luxury goods
(B) A diary that mentions luxury goods and services purchased by its author
(C) A theater ticket stamped with the date and name of a particular play
(D) A payroll record from a company that produced luxury goods such as pottery
(E) A newspaper advertisement describing luxury goods and services available at a seaside resort
if you look at the phrase in the second paragraph, you can see clearly that B is the answer. We do need something written that clearly state the will of the consumers at the time
only a study of relevant personal documents written by actual consumers will provide a precise picture of who wanted what.
19. According to the passage, Thompson attributes to laboring people in eighteenth-century England which of the following attitudes toward capitalist consumerism?
(A) Enthusiasm
(B) Curiosity
(C) Ambivalence
(D) Stubbornness
(E) Hostility
Thompson, while rightly restoring laboring people to the stage of eighteenth-century English history, has probably
exaggerated the opposition of these people to the inroads of capitalist consumerism in general;
E is the answer. However, notice how B is quite tricky but we do not have a firm clue about
20. In the third paragraph, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) contrasting two theses and offering a compromise
(B) questioning two explanations and proposing a possible alternative to them
(C) paraphrasing the work of two historians and questioning their assumptions
(D) examining two theories and endorsing one over the other
(E) raising several questions but implying that they cannot be answered.
1) the ability of manufacturers to advertise in a relatively uncensored press
2) The "middling sort" bought goods and services because
they wanted to follow fashions set by the rich.
Again,
we may wonder whether this explanation is sufficient. Do not people enjoy buying things as a form of self-gratification? If so, consumerism could be seen as a product of the rise of new concepts of individualism and materialism, but not necessarily of the frenzy for conspicuous competition.
The key sentence are above. This shows clearly they the answer is B
21. According to the passage, a Veblen model of conspicuous consumption has been used to
(A) investigate
the extent of the demand for luxury goods among social classes in eighteenth-century England
(B)
classify the kinds of lUXUry goods desired by eighteenth-century consumers
(C)
explain the motivation of eighteenth-century consumers to buy luxury goods
(D) establish
the extent to which the tastes of rich consumers were shaped by the middle classes in eighteenth-century England
(E)
compare luxury consumerism in eighteenth-century England with such consumerism in the twentieth century
This, however,
hardly seems a sufficient answer. McKendrick favors a Veblen
model of conspicuous consumption stimulated by competition for status.
C is the answer.
22. According to the passage, eighteenth-century England and the contemporary world of the passage's readers are
(A) dissimilar in the extent to which luxury consumerism could be said to be widespread among the social classes
(B) dissimilar in their definitions of luxury goods and services
(C) dissimilar in the extent to which lUXUry goods could be said to be a stimulant of industrial development
(D) similar in their strong demand for a variety of goods and services(E) similar in the extent to which a middle class could be identified as imitating the habits of a wealthier class
the insatiable demand in eighteenth-century England for frivolous as well as useful goods and services foreshadows our own world.
23. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most probably agree with which of the following statements about the relationship between the Industrial Revolution and the demand for lUXUry goods and services in eighteenth-century England?
(A) The growing demand for luxury goods and services was a major factor in the cQrning of the Industrial Revolution.
(B) The Industrial Revolution exploited the already existing demand for luxury goods and services.
(C) Although the demand for lUXUry goods may have helped bring about the Industrial Revolution, the demand for luxury services did not.
(D) There is no reason to believe that the Industrial Revolution was directly driven by a growing demand for luxury goods and services.
(E) The increasing demand for luxury goods and services was a cultural phenomenon that has been conclusively demonstrated to have been separate from the coming of the Industrial
Revolution.
Finally, what were the consequences of this consumer demand for luxuries? McKendrick claims that it goes a long way toward explaining the coming of the Industrial Revolution. But does it? What, for example, does the production of high-quality pottery and toys have to do with the development of iron manufacture or textile mills? It is perfectly possible to have the psychology and reality of
a consumer society without a heavy industrial sector
From the red part of the passage, we can infer that the demand for luxury goods and the overall phase in the history called the "Industrial Revolution" and not two different things mutually exclusive. Rather, the first is a piece of the whole: the IR.
Regards