Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
09 Aug 2020, 11:27
2
Expert Reply
8
Bookmarks
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as revolutionary, flying in the face of what is established and producing not what is acceptable but what will become accepted. According to this formulation, highly creative activity transcends the limits of an existing form and establishes a new principle of organization. However, the idea that extraordinary creativity transcends established limits is misleading when it is applied to the arts, even though it may be valid for the sciences. Differences between highly creative art and highly creative science arise in part from a difference in their goals. For the sciences, a new theory is the goal and end result of the creative act. Innovative science produces new propositions in terms of which diverse phenomena can be related to one another in more coherent ways. Such phenomena as a brilliant diamond or a nesting bird are relegated to the role of data, serving as the means for formulating or testing a new theory. The goal of highly creative art is very different: the phenomenon itself becomes the direct product of the creative act. Shakespeare's Hamlet is not a tract about the behavior of indecisive princes or the uses of political power; nor is Picasso's painting Guernica primarily a propositional statement about the Spanish Civil War or the evils of fascism. What highly creative artistic activity produces is not a new generalization that transcends established limits, but rather an aesthetic particular. Aesthetic particulars produced by the highly creative artist extend or exploit, in an innovative way, the limits of an existing form, rather than transcend that form.
This is not to deny that a highly creative artist sometimes establishes a new principle of organization in the history of an artistic field; the composer Monteverdi, who created music of the highest aesthetic value, comes to mind. More generally, however, whether or not a composition establishes a new principle in the history of music has little bearing on its aesthetic worth. Because they embody a new principle of organization, some musical works, such as the operas of the Florentine Camerata, are of signal historical importance, but few listeners or musicologists would include these among the great works of music. On the other hand, Mozart's The Marriage of Figaro is surely among the masterpieces of music even though its modest innovations are confined to extending existing means. It has been said of Beethoven that he toppled the rules and freed music from the stifling confines of convention. But a close study of his compositions reveals that Beethoven overturned no fundamental rules. Rather, he was an incomparable strategist who exploited limits-the rules, forms, and conventions that he inherited from predecessors such as Haydn and Mozart, Handel and Bach-in strikingly original ways.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
52% (03:05) correct
48% (02:52) wrong based on 103 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
21. The author considers a new theory that coherently relates diverse phenomena to one another to be the
(A) basis for reaffirming a well-established scientific formulation (B) byproduct of an aesthetic experience (C) tool used by a scientist to 'discover a new particular (D) synthesis underlying a great work of art (E) result of highly creative scientific activity
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
69% (01:12) correct
31% (01:25) wrong based on 91 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
22. The author implies that Beethoven's music was strikingly original because Beethoven
(A) strove to outdo his predecessors by becoming the first composer to exploit limits (B) fundamentally changed the musical forms of his predecessors by adopting a richly inventive strategy (C) embellished and interwove the melodies of several of the great composers who preceded him (D) manipulated the established conventions of musical composition in a highly innovative fashion (E) attempted to create the illusion of having transcended the musical forms of his predecessors
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
67% (01:06) correct
33% (01:45) wrong based on 82 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
23. The passage states that the operas of the Florentine Camerata are
(A) unjustifiably ignored by musicologists (B) not generally considered to be of high aesthetic value even though they are important in the history of music (C) among those works in which popular historical themes were portrayed in a musical production. (D) often inappropriately cited as examples of musical works in which a new principle of the organization was introduced (E) minor exceptions to the well-established generalIzatIOn that the aesthetic worth of a composition determines its importance in the history of music
Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
49% (01:45) correct
51% (01:35) wrong based on 93 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
24. The passage supplies information for answering all of the following questions EXCEPT:
(A) Has unusual creative activity been characterized as revolutionary? (B) Did 'Beethoven work within a musical tradition that also included Handel and Bach? (C) Is Mozart's The Marriage of Figaro an example of a creative work that transcended limits? (D) Who besides Monteverdi wrote music that the author would consider to embody new principles of organization and to be of high aesthetic value? (E) Does anyone claim that the goal of extraordinary creative activity in the arts differs from that of extraordinary creative activity in the sciences?
Question 5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
50% (01:09) correct
50% (01:04) wrong based on 76 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
25. The author regards the idea that all highly creative artistic activity transcends limits with
65% (01:13) correct
35% (01:10) wrong based on 80 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
26. The author implies that an innovative scientific contribution is one that
(A) is cited with high frequency in the publications of other scientists (B) is accepted immediately by the scientific community (C) does not relegate particulars to the role of data (D) presents the discovery of a new scientific fact (E) introduces a new valid generalization
Question 7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
57% (01:25) correct
43% (01:42) wrong based on 76 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
27. Which of the following statements would most logically conclude the last paragraph of the passage?
(A) Unlike Beethoven, however, even the greatest of modern composers, such as Stravinsky, did not transcend existing musical forms. (B) In similar fashion, existing musical forms were even further exploited by the next generation of great European composers. (C) Thus, many of the great composers displayed the same combination of talents exhibited by Monteverdi. (D) By contrast, the view that creativity in the arts exploits but does not transcend limits is supported in the field of literature. (E) Actually, Beethoven's most original works were largely unappreciated at the time that they were first performed.
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
13 Sep 2020, 05:58
5
Farina wrote:
Please explain 26 and 27
26) the answer is E) since its derived from this line What highly creative artistic activity produces is not a new generalization'that transcends established limits,
27) this one is little tricky, but rule of elimination will help. basically the last 3 lines discuss about beethoven and his art use(he has just modified the prexisting rules by Handel, Bach etc from line predecessors such as Haydn and Mozart, Handel and Bach-in strikingly original ways). So option b) is the closest to this assertion. Other options are either over inference or generalisations which we need to avoid
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
19 Sep 2020, 02:33
2
chickanduck wrote:
can someone explain why the answer to question 24 is not E?
"Shakespeare's Hamlet is not a tract about the behavior of indecisive princes or the uses of political power; nor is Picasso's painting Guernica primarily a propositional statement about the Spanish Civil War or the evils of fascism." This sentence makes option E present for the inference and that's why it is not a correct choice.
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
24 Sep 2020, 10:00
I failed only in one question: number 26. I chose the option D because I felt more comfortable with it but in the text the option E is found literally:
Quote:
What highly creative artistic activity produces is not a new generalization'that transcends established limits, but rather an aesthetic particular
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
26 Sep 2020, 09:53
2
Expert Reply
For the sciences, a new theory is the goal and end result of the creative act. Innovative science produces new propositions in terms of which diverse phenomena can be related to one another in more coherent ways. Such phenomena as a brilliant diamond or a nesting bird are relegated to the role of data, serving as the means for formulating or testing a new theory. The goal of highly creative art is very different:
What highly creative artistic activity produces is not a new generalization'that transcends established limits, but rather an aesthetic particular.
From the sentence above the science must produce a generalization or a theory which is consistent with the facts at stake.
Art instead works at the exact opposite.........
For the 26 question therefore we imply that science produces a generalization
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
29 Sep 2020, 12:18
3
23 Is probably the staright forward amongst all them
Explanation : The author sites the example of operas of the Florentine Camerata to state that they are not considered for their aesthetic even though they embody new body of organization .This is seen in the second passage from line 4. The option that fits in well with this logic is B .
IF YOU LIKE THIS EXPLANATION GIVE KUDO'S THIS WOULD HELP ME TO TAKE PRACTICE TESTS
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
03 Feb 2021, 06:51
For Q26, I can understand why (D) is correct, however, can someone explain why (E) is incorrect. I have not seen an instance of anyone claiming that the goal of extraordinary creative activity in the arts differs from that of extraordinary creative activity in the sciences, besides the author himself. I thought it was meant as someone quoting it explicitly excluding the author.
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
03 Feb 2021, 10:38
Expert Reply
strategist wrote:
For Q26, I can understand why (D) is correct, however, can someone explain why (E) is incorrect. I have not seen an instance of anyone claiming that the goal of extraordinary creative activity in the arts differs from that of extraordinary creative activity in the sciences, besides the author himself. I thought it was meant as someone quoting it explicitly excluding the author.
Wait
In the passage the [spoiler] OA was mismatched. It was positioned ABOVE the question. I assume you eyed that BELOW the question. Or something like that
Now I fixed it. Sorry if you see a lot of questions without the OA or passages like this one.
We had the major upgrade of the board and we are fixing all the timers in each discussion in the RC forum. Considering we have to do it or edit MANUALLY. You know is a long process
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
03 Feb 2021, 11:07
Yeah, Carcass, I get it, however, the question numbers have got jumbled here as well. You can see the 1st problem, below it has 21. has number written as well. As for the problem I'm having doubt is this one:-
Quote:
The passage supplies information for answering all of the following questions EXCEPT:
(A) Has unusual creative activity been characterized as revolutionary? (B) Did 'Beethoven work within a musical tradition that also included Handel and Bach? (C) Is Mozart's The Marriage of Figaro an example of a creative work that transcended limits? (D) Who besides Monteverdi wrote music that the author would consider to embody new principles of organization and to be of high aesthetic value? (E) Does anyone claim that the goal of extraordinary creative activity in the arts differs from that of extraordinary creative activity in the sciences?
I'm not understanding why (E) is incorrect as I have not seen an instance of anyone claiming that the goal of extraordinary creative activity in the arts differs from that of extraordinary creative activity in the sciences, besides the author himself. I thought it was meant as someone quoting it explicitly excluding the author
Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
03 Feb 2021, 11:17
Expert Reply
strategist wrote:
Yeah, Carcass, I get it, however, the question numbers have got jumbled here as well. You can see the 1st problem, below it has 21. has number written as well. As for the problem I'm having doubt is this one:-
Quote:
The passage supplies information for answering all of the following questions EXCEPT:
(A) Has unusual creative activity been characterized as revolutionary? (B) Did 'Beethoven work within a musical tradition that also included Handel and Bach? (C) Is Mozart's The Marriage of Figaro an example of a creative work that transcended limits? (D) Who besides Monteverdi wrote music that the author would consider to embody new principles of organization and to be of high aesthetic value? (E) Does anyone claim that the goal of extraordinary creative activity in the arts differs from that of extraordinary creative activity in the sciences?
I'm not understanding why (E) is incorrect as I have not seen an instance of anyone claiming that the goal of extraordinary creative activity in the arts differs from that of extraordinary creative activity in the sciences, besides the author himself. I thought it was meant as someone quoting it explicitly excluding the author
E is CORRECT as the answer. D is INCORRECT
This is an except question: you have to find that is LESS relevant or not mentioned in the passage clearly or not
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
03 Feb 2021, 11:21
Expert Reply
Quote:
(E) Does anyone claim that the goal of extraordinary creative activity in the arts differs from that of extraordinary creative activity in the sciences?
Differences between highly creative art and highly creative science arise in part from a difference in their goals. For the sciences, a new theory is the goal and end result of the creative act.
So you can answer E, which is a question, in the passage
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re
[#permalink]
03 Aug 2021, 10:33
Expert Reply
The last sentence pf the FIRST paragraph tells you the role of the next one
Quote:
Aesthetic particulars produced by the highly creative artist extend or exploit, in an innovative way, the limits of an existing form, rather than transcend that form.
Lines to consider: "However, the idea that extraordinary creativity transcends established limits is misleading when it is applied to the arts, even though it may be valid for the sciences". Author finds the idea misleading when it is applied to arts, thus making option A a better choice. Author doesn't seem to indignant (option B) about the claim, he is skeptical as he thinks the idea might be valid for sciences. Other options can be easily eliminated.
Hope this helps!
gmatclubot
Re: Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as re [#permalink]