Last visit was: 05 Nov 2024, 08:49 It is currently 05 Nov 2024, 08:49

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29891
Own Kudos [?]: 36123 [6]
Given Kudos: 25919
Send PM
Most Helpful Community Reply
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 348
Own Kudos [?]: 947 [19]
Given Kudos: 0
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2019
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29891
Own Kudos [?]: 36123 [0]
Given Kudos: 25919
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
Expert Reply
I do not know where that question comes from.

However, I posted the RC passage straight from the paper Official Guide. Which is clearly the right resource.

Regards
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 274 [0]
Given Kudos: 97
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
Can someone explain question 18? I selected D, which was wrong
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 274 [0]
Given Kudos: 97
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
1
Thank you, theBrahmaTiger. I didn't notice this part of the passage helps eliminate D "this symbiotic association can be harnessed to achieve more economical use of costly super phosphate fertilizer and to permit better exploitation of cheaper, less soluble rock phosphate."

If I'm not mistaken, "can be harnessed" also means "can be further researched"
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 348
Own Kudos [?]: 947 [4]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
4
mind wrote:
Thank you, theBrahmaTiger. I didn't notice this part of the passage helps eliminate D "this symbiotic association can be harnessed to achieve more economical use of costly super phosphate fertilizer and to permit better exploitation of cheaper, less soluble rock phosphate."

If I'm not mistaken, "can be harnessed" also means "can be further researched"


Harnessed here means utilized or used for
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2020
Posts: 90
Own Kudos [?]: 82 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
For Q19,
Quote:
19. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following has been a factor influencing the extent to which research on mycorrhizal fungi has progressed?

(A) Lack of funding for such research
(B) Lack of immediate application of such research
(C) Lack of a method for identifying mycorrhizal fungi
(D) Difficulties surrounding laboratory production of specimens for study
(E) Difficulties ensuing from the high cost and scarcity of superphosphate fertilizers


This sentence in the passage, mentions 2 reasons why the fungi has escaped widespread attention until recently:
Quote:
First, the symbiotic association is so well-balanced that the roots of host plants show no damage even when densely infected. Second, the fungi cannot as yet be cultivated in the absence of a living root.

The 2 reasons mentioned are first, the infestation is not conspicuous, and second, it's difficult to replicate the experiment in a labaratory. Option C points to the first reason and option D points to the 2nd reason.
Can someone clarify why option C is eliminated?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 May 2020
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
theBrahmaTiger wrote:
mind wrote:
Can someone explain question 18? I selected D, which was wrong


18. The level of information in the passage above is suited to the needs of all of the following people EXCEPT

(A) a researcher whose job is to identify potentially profitable areas for research and product development
The passage says that the symbiotic relationship can be utilized to achieve more economical use of costly superphosphate fertilizer.. So, this can be inferred

(B) a state official whose position requires her to alert farmers about possible innovations in farming
A state official can alert farmers about Mycorrhizal benefits of improving phosphate uptake in host plants and increased nitrogen fixation beyond levels.

(C) an official of a research foundation who identifies research projects for potential funding
The last sentence suggests that this area still requires further research, so this one can be inferred

(D) a biologist attempting to keep up with scientific developments in an area outside of his immediate area of specialization
this symbiotic association can be harnessed to achieve more economical use of costly super phosphate fertilizer and to permit better exploitation of cheaper, less soluble rock phosphate. This chemical related discovery may intrigue a biologist to study the fungi in more detail.

(E) a botanist conducting experiments to determine the relationship between degree of mycorrhizal infection and expected uptake of phosphate
It's neither mentioned nor implied in the passage about up to what degree uptake of phosphate would rise by increasing the level of mycorrhizal infection. We are only told that the infection is related to uptake of phosphate, but no information is provided on their levels. This is the answer.


Can someone explain this answer in more dept please?

Regards
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
I had the same doubt @Zohair123. Can someone please answer this why the answer for 19th is d and not c?


For Q19,
Quote:
19. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following has been a factor influencing the extent to which research on mycorrhizal fungi has progressed?

(A) Lack of funding for such research
(B) Lack of immediate application of such research
(C) Lack of a method for identifying mycorrhizal fungi
(D) Difficulties surrounding laboratory production of specimens for study
(E) Difficulties ensuing from the high cost and scarcity of superphosphate fertilizers


This sentence in the passage, mentions 2 reasons why the fungi has escaped widespread attention until recently:
Quote:
First, the symbiotic association is so well-balanced that the roots of host plants show no damage even when densely infected. Second, the fungi cannot as yet be cultivated in the absence of a living root.

The 2 reasons mentioned are first, the infestation is not conspicuous, and second, it's difficult to replicate the experiment in a labaratory. Option C points to the first reason and option D points to the 2nd reason.
Can someone clarify why option C is eliminated?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
Can someone please explain question 20? I marked E is the answer. Y is the answer A?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29891
Own Kudos [?]: 36123 [2]
Given Kudos: 25919
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
2
Expert Reply
First of all

First, the symbiotic association is so well-balanced that the roots of host plants show no damage even when densely infected. Second, the fungi cannot as yet be cultivated in the absence of a living root. Despite these difficulties, there has been important new work that suggests

From above, no one said that the fungi CANNOT be cultivated in laboratory or study: the can't be reproduced if we do NOT have living root



It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following has been a factor influencing the extent to which research on mycorrhizal fungi has progressed?

(A) Lack of funding for such research

No money is mentioned

(B) Lack of immediate application of such research

We do have even though the scenario is not totally clear

(C) Lack of a method for identifying mycorrhizal fungi

See my explanation above

(D) Difficulties surrounding laboratory production of specimens for study

Correct

(E) Difficulties ensuing from the high cost and scarcity of superphosphate fertilizers


High cost and scarcity are not mentioned in the passage


20. The passage suggests which of the following about the increased resistance to harmful root fungi that some plants infected with mycorrhizal fungi seem to exhibit?

(A) There are at least three hypotheses that might account for the increase.

Correct. It is mentioned in the last sentence of the passage

(B) An explanation lies in the fact that mycorrhizal fungi increase more rapidly in number than harmful root fungi do.

More rapidly is not mentioned

(C) The plants that show increased resistance also exhibit improved nitrogen fixation.

We do not know. It is not addressed by the passage at all this dual possibiltiy

(D) Such increases may be independent of mycorrhizal infection.

I do not think so otherwise the entire passage would not exists

(E) It is unlikely that a satisfactory explanation can be found to account for the increase.

We do not know. We are investigating along with 3 main hypothesis


Hope this helps
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2020
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
Carcass wrote:
First of all

First, the symbiotic association is so well-balanced that the roots of host plants show no damage even when densely infected. Second, the fungi cannot as yet be cultivated in the absence of a living root. Despite these difficulties, there has been important new work that suggests

From above, no one said that the fungi CANNOT be cultivated in laboratory or study: the can't be reproduced if we do NOT have living root



It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following has been a factor influencing the extent to which research on mycorrhizal fungi has progressed?

(A) Lack of funding for such research

No money is mentioned

(B) Lack of immediate application of such research

We do have even though the scenario is not totally clear

(C) Lack of a method for identifying mycorrhizal fungi

See my explanation above

(D) Difficulties surrounding laboratory production of specimens for study

Correct

(E) Difficulties ensuing from the high cost and scarcity of superphosphate fertilizers


High cost and scarcity are not mentioned in the passage


20. The passage suggests which of the following about the increased resistance to harmful root fungi that some plants infected with mycorrhizal fungi seem to exhibit?

(A) There are at least three hypotheses that might account for the increase.

Correct. It is mentioned in the last sentence of the passage

(B) An explanation lies in the fact that mycorrhizal fungi increase more rapidly in number than harmful root fungi do.

More rapidly is not mentioned

(C) The plants that show increased resistance also exhibit improved nitrogen fixation.

We do not know. It is not addressed by the passage at all this dual possibiltiy

(D) Such increases may be independent of mycorrhizal infection.

I do not think so otherwise the entire passage would not exists

(E) It is unlikely that a satisfactory explanation can be found to account for the increase.

We do not know. We are investigating along with 3 main hypothesis


Hope this helps


@Carcass, I don't think you have explained why C is wrong. The passage states that the roots SHOW NO DAMAGE even when infected which makes me think that it is hard to see when the roots have the fungi; this is definitely a problem because it is included in "these difficulties".

Thank you for your help.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29891
Own Kudos [?]: 36123 [0]
Given Kudos: 25919
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
Expert Reply
kaushikdr wrote:
Carcass wrote:
First of all

First, the symbiotic association is so well-balanced that the roots of host plants show no damage even when densely infected. Second, the fungi cannot as yet be cultivated in the absence of a living root. Despite these difficulties, there has been important new work that suggests

From above, no one said that the fungi CANNOT be cultivated in laboratory or study: the can't be reproduced if we do NOT have living root



It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following has been a factor influencing the extent to which research on mycorrhizal fungi has progressed?

(A) Lack of funding for such research

No money is mentioned

(B) Lack of immediate application of such research

We do have even though the scenario is not totally clear

(C) Lack of a method for identifying mycorrhizal fungi

See my explanation above

(D) Difficulties surrounding laboratory production of specimens for study

Correct

(E) Difficulties ensuing from the high cost and scarcity of superphosphate fertilizers


High cost and scarcity are not mentioned in the passage


20. The passage suggests which of the following about the increased resistance to harmful root fungi that some plants infected with mycorrhizal fungi seem to exhibit?

(A) There are at least three hypotheses that might account for the increase.

Correct. It is mentioned in the last sentence of the passage

(B) An explanation lies in the fact that mycorrhizal fungi increase more rapidly in number than harmful root fungi do.

More rapidly is not mentioned

(C) The plants that show increased resistance also exhibit improved nitrogen fixation.

We do not know. It is not addressed by the passage at all this dual possibiltiy

(D) Such increases may be independent of mycorrhizal infection.

I do not think so otherwise the entire passage would not exists

(E) It is unlikely that a satisfactory explanation can be found to account for the increase.

We do not know. We are investigating along with 3 main hypothesis


Hope this helps


@Carcass, I don't think you have explained why C is wrong. The passage states that the roots SHOW NO DAMAGE even when infected which makes me think that it is hard to see when the roots have the fungi; this is definitely a problem because it is included in "these difficulties".

Thank you for your help.


Which one ?? the 20th ??
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2020
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
@Carcass, Question 19.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29891
Own Kudos [?]: 36123 [0]
Given Kudos: 25919
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
Expert Reply
19. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following has been a factor influencing the extent to which research on mycorrhizal fungi has progressed?

(A) Lack of funding for such research
(B) Lack of immediate application of such research
(C) Lack of a method for identifying mycorrhizal fungi

In legumes, mycorrhizal inoculation has increased nitrogen fixation beyond levels achieved by adding phosphate fertilizer alone.

If we can inoculate the fungi we CAN identify it for sure.

(D) Difficulties surrounding laboratory production of specimens for study

Second, the fungi cannot as yet be cultivated in the absence of a living root. Correct D from the sentence

(E) Difficulties ensuing from the high cost and scarcity of superphosphate fertilizers
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2020
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
I selected D for 18 too...
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Sep 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
theBrahmaTiger wrote:
mind wrote:
Can someone explain question 18? I selected D, which was wrong


18. The level of information in the passage above is suited to the needs of all of the following people EXCEPT

(A) a researcher whose job is to identify potentially profitable areas for research and product development
The passage says that the symbiotic relationship can be utilized to achieve more economical use of costly superphosphate fertilizer.. So, this can be inferred

(B) a state official whose position requires her to alert farmers about possible innovations in farming
A state official can alert farmers about Mycorrhizal benefits of improving phosphate uptake in host plants and increased nitrogen fixation beyond levels.

(C) an official of a research foundation who identifies research projects for potential funding
The last sentence suggests that this area still requires further research, so this one can be inferred

(D) a biologist attempting to keep up with scientific developments in an area outside of his immediate area of specialization
this symbiotic association can be harnessed to achieve more economical use of costly super phosphate fertilizer and to permit better exploitation of cheaper, less soluble rock phosphate. This chemical related discovery may intrigue a biologist to study the fungi in more detail.

(E) a botanist conducting experiments to determine the relationship between degree of mycorrhizal infection and expected uptake of phosphate
It's neither mentioned nor implied in the passage about up to what degree uptake of phosphate would rise by increasing the level of mycorrhizal infection. We are only told that the infection is related to uptake of phosphate, but no information is provided on their levels. This is the answer.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2020
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
Can someone explain 18 why isn't it C?
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2020
Posts: 163
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
GRE 1: Q165 V157

GRE 2: Q165 V156

GRE 3: Q166 V159
Send PM
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
1
7 minutes 4 seconds

4/4 !

Q3 was tricky and had to reread multiple times
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Mycorrhizal fungi infect more plants than do any other fungi [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
228 posts
GRE Instructor
1063 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne