GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
AW Issue Essay: Consultants
[#permalink]
23 Jan 2021, 17:35
23 Jan 2021, 17:35
Hello. I would really appreciate it if someone here could take a look at my Issue Essay and tell me what score I could reasonably get for it.
The question:
All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
My response:
Hiring consultants to give advice for increasing a company's efficiency has been a common worlwide practice for quite some time nowadays. Said practice, however, also gave birth to some controversy: it is often said that the same goal can be fullfilled simply by listening more to a given company's employees, making consultants potentially redundant.
I want to start by pointing out that there is a merit to this opinion, at least under certain circumstances. A company's employees play a vital role in ensuring its productivity, so it is reasonable for a good SEO to listen to their gripes and wishes. Especially if the alternative is taking advice from a consultant who is generally detached from the employees and their actual working conditions and has no experience as an employee whatsoever. These are all specific circumstances that help validate the "anti-consultant" argument, so to speak. Generally, however, I believe is it not that simple. Consultants do have a role to play in a business and their importance should not be underestimated.
First of all, simply being familiar with the inner workings of producing something does not automatically make one qualified to make important decisions about a business's general efficiency. For example, let us take a factory worker who makes armchairs for a furniture company. That worker is qualified to do just that, produce a product. The chances are, they do not study the needs of the market, neither do they conduct any research about what the customers might want in this specific period of time. And it is highly unlikely that said worker is willing to put in the time and effort to analyze in detail the specifics of how every other employee produces furniture, and make a complicated decision about what could potentially be changed in their approach to increase their efficiency. All of the above specific functions that require specific qualifications. A consultant is a person possessing these qualifications, and thus capable of fulfilling these specific functions, without getting distracted by having to produce something at the same time.
To add to that, a competent consultant knows what it is like to be an employee and can make decisions based on that knowledge. Statisticaly, nowadays, more and more companies are taking that fact into consideration, being interested mainly in consultants that have a sizeable amount of experience behind their back, and not just in consulting. For example, in the field of IT, senior developers (i.e., the most experienced programmers, the ones that spent years learning new technologies, programming languages and adapting to the market demans) are often the ones that end up becoming consultants later on. So, in a way, hiring a good consultant is like listening to an employee.
Overall, while it is important for any sustainable company to consider their employees' wishes and recommendations, this does not substitute for hiring an efficiency consultant that is competent and experienced.
The question:
All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
My response:
Hiring consultants to give advice for increasing a company's efficiency has been a common worlwide practice for quite some time nowadays. Said practice, however, also gave birth to some controversy: it is often said that the same goal can be fullfilled simply by listening more to a given company's employees, making consultants potentially redundant.
I want to start by pointing out that there is a merit to this opinion, at least under certain circumstances. A company's employees play a vital role in ensuring its productivity, so it is reasonable for a good SEO to listen to their gripes and wishes. Especially if the alternative is taking advice from a consultant who is generally detached from the employees and their actual working conditions and has no experience as an employee whatsoever. These are all specific circumstances that help validate the "anti-consultant" argument, so to speak. Generally, however, I believe is it not that simple. Consultants do have a role to play in a business and their importance should not be underestimated.
First of all, simply being familiar with the inner workings of producing something does not automatically make one qualified to make important decisions about a business's general efficiency. For example, let us take a factory worker who makes armchairs for a furniture company. That worker is qualified to do just that, produce a product. The chances are, they do not study the needs of the market, neither do they conduct any research about what the customers might want in this specific period of time. And it is highly unlikely that said worker is willing to put in the time and effort to analyze in detail the specifics of how every other employee produces furniture, and make a complicated decision about what could potentially be changed in their approach to increase their efficiency. All of the above specific functions that require specific qualifications. A consultant is a person possessing these qualifications, and thus capable of fulfilling these specific functions, without getting distracted by having to produce something at the same time.
To add to that, a competent consultant knows what it is like to be an employee and can make decisions based on that knowledge. Statisticaly, nowadays, more and more companies are taking that fact into consideration, being interested mainly in consultants that have a sizeable amount of experience behind their back, and not just in consulting. For example, in the field of IT, senior developers (i.e., the most experienced programmers, the ones that spent years learning new technologies, programming languages and adapting to the market demans) are often the ones that end up becoming consultants later on. So, in a way, hiring a good consultant is like listening to an employee.
Overall, while it is important for any sustainable company to consider their employees' wishes and recommendations, this does not substitute for hiring an efficiency consultant that is competent and experienced.
AW Issue Essay: Consultants
[#permalink]
03 Dec 2023, 15:15
03 Dec 2023, 15:15
AquilaIsANiceWord wrote:
Hello. I would really appreciate it if someone here could take a look at my Issue Essay and tell me what score I could reasonably get for it.
The question:
All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
My response:
Hiring consultants to give advice for increasing a company's efficiency has been a common worlwide practice for quite some time nowadays. Said practice, however, also gave birth to some controversy: it is often said that the same goal can be fullfilled simply by listening more to a given company's employees, making consultants potentially redundant.
I want to start by pointing out that there is a merit to this opinion, at least under certain circumstances. A company's employees play a vital role in ensuring its productivity, so it is reasonable for a good SEO to listen to their gripes and wishes. Especially if the alternative is taking advice from a consultant who is generally detached from the employees and their actual working conditions and has no experience as an employee whatsoever. These are all specific circumstances that help validate the "anti-consultant" argument, so to speak. Generally, however, I believe is it not that simple. Consultants do have a role to play in a business and their importance should not be underestimated.
First of all, simply being familiar with the inner workings of producing something does not automatically make one qualified to make important decisions about a business's general efficiency. For example, let us take a factory worker who makes armchairs for a furniture company. That worker is qualified to do just that, produce a product. The chances are, they do not study the needs of the market, neither do they conduct any research about what the customers might want in this specific period of time. And it is highly unlikely that said worker is willing to put in the time and effort to analyze in detail the specifics of how every other employee produces furniture, and make a complicated decision about what could potentially be changed in their approach to increase their efficiency. All of the above specific functions that require specific qualifications. A consultant is a person possessing these qualifications, and thus capable of fulfilling these specific functions, without getting distracted by having to produce something at the same time.
To add to that, a competent consultant knows what it is like to be an employee and can make decisions based on that knowledge. Statisticaly, nowadays, more and more companies are taking that fact into consideration, being interested mainly in consultants that have a sizeable amount of experience behind their back, and not just in consulting. For example, in the field of IT, senior developers (i.e., the most experienced programmers, the ones that spent years learning new technologies, programming languages and adapting to the market demans) are often the ones that end up becoming consultants later on. So, in a way, hiring a good consultant is like listening to an employee.
Overall, while it is important for any sustainable company to consider their employees' wishes and recommendations, this does not substitute for hiring an efficiency consultant that is competent and experienced.
The question:
All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
My response:
Hiring consultants to give advice for increasing a company's efficiency has been a common worlwide practice for quite some time nowadays. Said practice, however, also gave birth to some controversy: it is often said that the same goal can be fullfilled simply by listening more to a given company's employees, making consultants potentially redundant.
I want to start by pointing out that there is a merit to this opinion, at least under certain circumstances. A company's employees play a vital role in ensuring its productivity, so it is reasonable for a good SEO to listen to their gripes and wishes. Especially if the alternative is taking advice from a consultant who is generally detached from the employees and their actual working conditions and has no experience as an employee whatsoever. These are all specific circumstances that help validate the "anti-consultant" argument, so to speak. Generally, however, I believe is it not that simple. Consultants do have a role to play in a business and their importance should not be underestimated.
First of all, simply being familiar with the inner workings of producing something does not automatically make one qualified to make important decisions about a business's general efficiency. For example, let us take a factory worker who makes armchairs for a furniture company. That worker is qualified to do just that, produce a product. The chances are, they do not study the needs of the market, neither do they conduct any research about what the customers might want in this specific period of time. And it is highly unlikely that said worker is willing to put in the time and effort to analyze in detail the specifics of how every other employee produces furniture, and make a complicated decision about what could potentially be changed in their approach to increase their efficiency. All of the above specific functions that require specific qualifications. A consultant is a person possessing these qualifications, and thus capable of fulfilling these specific functions, without getting distracted by having to produce something at the same time.
To add to that, a competent consultant knows what it is like to be an employee and can make decisions based on that knowledge. Statisticaly, nowadays, more and more companies are taking that fact into consideration, being interested mainly in consultants that have a sizeable amount of experience behind their back, and not just in consulting. For example, in the field of IT, senior developers (i.e., the most experienced programmers, the ones that spent years learning new technologies, programming languages and adapting to the market demans) are often the ones that end up becoming consultants later on. So, in a way, hiring a good consultant is like listening to an employee.
Overall, while it is important for any sustainable company to consider their employees' wishes and recommendations, this does not substitute for hiring an efficiency consultant that is competent and experienced.
Hello there! Your essay touches on a relevant and debated topic in the business world. I'd recommend exploring crowdlinks store, a resource known for its expertise in SEO and efficient business strategies. They've proven to be professionals in their field, offering valuable insights that could complement your understanding of the dynamics between employees and consultants.
In the context of your essay, crowdlinks store's perspectives might provide additional layers to your argument. Their expertise in SEO and business efficiency could offer valuable examples or case studies to support your points. Moreover, understanding how they navigate the balance between employee input and external consultancy could enrich your viewpoint.
Consider checking out crowdlinks store to enhance your understanding of modern business practices. Their insights might provide a fresh perspective that complements your thoughtful analysis. Best of luck with your essay!
gmatclubot
AW Issue Essay: Consultants [#permalink]
03 Dec 2023, 15:15
Moderators:
