Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
OG_VPR # 20/21/22/23 In the early twentieth century, the ide
[#permalink]
12 Oct 2016, 07:15
1
Expert Reply
19
Bookmarks
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
In the early twentieth century, the idea that pianists should be musician-scholars whose playing reflected the way composers wanted their music to sound replaced the notion that pianists should be virtuosos whose performances thrilled audiences with emotional daring and showy displays of technique. One important figure to emerge in the period, though a harpsichordist rather than a pianist, was Wanda Landowska (1879–1959). She demonstrated how the keyboard works of Baroque composers such as Bach, Handel, Scarlatti, and Couperin probably sounded in their own times. It would be a mistake to consider Landowska a classicist, however. She had been born in an age of Romantic playing dominated by Liszt, Leschetizky, and their pupils. Thus she grew up with and was influenced by certain Romantic traditions of performance, whatever the stringency of her musical scholarship; Landowska knew how to hold audiences breathless, and when she gave recitals, they responded with deathlike silence and rapt attention.
Her playing was Romantic, but it was at least as close in spirit to the style of playing intended by composers of the Baroque (1600–1750) and Classical (1750–1830) eras, as have been the more exacting but less emotionally resonant interpretations of most harpsichordists since Landowska. She had a miraculous quality of touch, a seemingly autonomous left hand; no artist in her generation could clarify with such deftness the polyphonic writing of the Baroque masters. And none could make their music so spring to life.
Her achievements were the result of a lifetime of scholarship, truly remarkable physical gifts, and resilient rhythm, all combined with excellent judgment about when not to hold the printed note sacrosanct. Of course, developing such judgment demanded considerable experience and imagination. She was a genius at underlining the dramatic and emotional content of a piece, and to do so, she took liberties, all kinds of liberties, while nevertheless preserving the integrity of a composer’s score. In short, her entire musical approach was Romantic: intensely personal, full of light and shade, never pedantic.
Thanks to Landowska, Bach’s music (originally composed for the harpsichord) now sounded inappropriately thick when played on the piano. One by one, pianists stopped playing Bach’s music as adapted for the piano by Liszt or by Tausig. Then they gradually stopped performing any kind of Baroque music on the piano, even Scarlatti’s. The piano repertoire, it began to be felt, was extensive enough without reverting to transcriptions of Baroque music originally written for the harpsichord—and piano performances of Bach and Scarlatti were, despite the obvious similarities between the harpsichord and the piano, transcriptions, no matter how faithfully the original notes were played. In accordance with this kind of purism came an emphasis on studying composers’ manuscript notations, a relatively new field of musicology that is flourishing even today.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
51% (03:16) correct
49% (02:45) wrong based on 122 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
The passage suggests that Landowska’s playing embodied a rejection of which of the following?
A) Emotionally resonant interpretations of musical works. B) An audience’s complete silence during a performance. C) Performances of previously obscure Baroque works. D) The idea that a performer can correctly judge when not to hold the printed note sacrosanct. E) Performances emphasizing showy displays of technique that compromise the integrity of a composer’s original score.
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
53% (01:24) correct
47% (01:35) wrong based on 108 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the compositions of Scarlatti?
A) They were adapted by Liszt and Tausig. B) They have not been transcribed faithfully. C) They were not composed during the Baroque period. D) They were composed for instruments other than piano. E) They fell out of favor with most musicians in the early twentieth century.
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
26% (01:11) correct
74% (01:39) wrong based on 106 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
The passage suggests that Landowska would probably have objected most strongly to which of the following?
A) A performance of a Bach keyboard piece played on the harpsichord. B) A performance of a Handel organ piece on a Baroque pipe organ. C) A modern composition written for a harpsichord and two pianos. D) A piano solo in which the performer occasionally departs from the tempo indicated by the composer. E) A performance of a piano and violin sonata in which the piano part is played on the harpsichord.
Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
58% (01:04) correct
42% (01:35) wrong based on 91 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
The author’s assertion that Landowska should not be considered a classicist serves primarily to emphasize which of the following?
A) Landowska specialized in playing the works of composers of the Baroque era. B) Landowska’s repertoire included orchestral music only. C) Landowska’s musical performances were not devoid of emotion. D) Landowska’s repertoire emphasized works of long-lasting interest and value. E) Landowska advocated the study of Classical style or form.
Re: OG_VPR # 20/21/22/23 In the early twentieth century, the ide
[#permalink]
12 Oct 2016, 07:18
2
Expert Reply
Explanation
20) Choice E is correct because throughout the passage Wanda Landowska’s playing serves as the embodiment of the historical change described in the passage’s first sentence: the replacement of “showy displays of technique” in favor of playing that “reflected the way composers wanted their music to sound.” The passage later describes Landowska’s playing as “preserving the integrity of the composer’s original score.”
21) In the last paragraph, the passage states that pianists gradually stopped playing Scarlatti’s music on the piano because they felt that the piano repertoire was extensive enough and that they had no need to resort to transcriptions of harpsichord pieces. It follows from this that Scarlatti’s music was not written for the piano, so Choice D is correct.
22) The passage tells us that Landowska was an adherent of the idea that performers of other people’s musical works should play “the way composers wanted their music to sound” (line 2). In the context of the passage, this means that performers shoulduse the instrument for which the music was originally written. This rules out Choices B, C, and D, as they are not examples of this kind of deviation from the composers’ intentions. Choice A is incorrect, since the passage tells us that Bach’s music was “originally composed for the harpsichord” (line 28). This leaves Choice E as the only correct option: Landowska would object to the music originally intended for the piano being performed on a harpsichord.
23) The second paragraph of the passage suggests that the primary difference between the Classical and the Romantic styles of playing is that the former puts emphasis on technical mastery and faithfulness to the original score, while the latter focuses on the emotional aspects of a performance. Therefore, Choice C is correct.
Could you please clarify the 2?, I didn't choose D because " They were composed for instruments other than piano."
It the passage it is stated "Baroque music originally written for the harpsichord—and piano performances of Bach and Scarlatti were, despite the obvious similarities between the harpsichord and the piano,"
That was composed for harpsichord so that's why i reject it, cuz os the plural in the word instruments...
Re: OG_VPR # 20/21/22/23 In the early twentieth century, the ide
[#permalink]
24 Feb 2021, 23:53
1
Expert Reply
You have committed the "holy grail error" that ALl the students do when they must tackle an inference question in such passage, long and complex. BTW it is an official one.
You must understand the big picture and read very SUPR careful
Thanks to Landowska, Bach’s music (originally composed for the harpsichord) now sounded inappropriately thick when played on the piano. One by one, pianists stopped playing Bach’s music as adapted for the piano by Liszt or by Tausig. Then they gradually stopped performing any kind of Baroque music on the piano, even Scarlatti’s.
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the compositions of Scarlatti?
A) They were adapted by Liszt and Tausig.
Not true. Was Bach or else. I do not care
B) They have not been transcribed faithfully.
Never said that
C) They were not composed during the Baroque period.
No . They came after
D) They were composed for instruments other than piano.
Exactly. From the portion of the text highlighted above, we do know this
E) They fell out of favor with most musicians in the early twentieth century.
Re: OG_VPR # 20/21/22/23 In the early twentieth century, the ide
[#permalink]
11 Aug 2021, 03:28
I'm having difficulty comprehending the second paragraph, "but it was at least as close in spirit to the style of playing intended by composers of the Baroque (1600–1750) and Classical (1750–1830) eras, as have been the more exacting but less emotionally resonant interpretations of most harpsichordists since Landowska". Can someone please help me out here?
Re: OG_VPR # 20/21/22/23 In the early twentieth century, the ide
[#permalink]
11 Aug 2021, 04:14
amolborgaonkar wrote:
I'm having difficulty comprehending the second paragraph, "but it was at least as close in spirit to the style of playing intended by composers of the Baroque (1600–1750) and Classical (1750–1830) eras, as have been the more exacting but less emotionally resonant interpretations of most harpsichordists since Landowska". Can someone please help me out here?
Hi There!
Though I am not a verbal expert, let me try to help you with this. First, understanding the first paragraph in this passage is really really important. If this is done correctly the other three paragraphs are easy to understand.
In the early twentieth century, the idea that pianists should be musician-scholars whose playing reflected the way composers wanted their music to sound replaced the notion that pianists should be virtuosos whose performances thrilled audiences with emotional daring and showy displays of technique.
To summarize this part says that pianists should be virtuosos. I interpreted this by saying that piano artists were the centre piece of the performance and thus thrilled the audience. Also, there were certain music which were composed for some other instrument but this was replaced by the pianist playing the major role
One important figure to emerge in the period, though a harpsichordist rather than a pianist, was Wanda Landowska (1879–1959). She demonstrated how the keyboard works of Baroque composers such as Bach, Handel, Scarlatti, and Couperin probably sounded in their own times.
The author is introducing a contradicting view and introduces WL and I can also imply that the author is in support of this contradicting view.
It would be a mistake to consider Landowska a classicist, however. She had been born in an age of Romantic playing dominated by Liszt, Leschetizky, and their pupils. Thus she grew up with and was influenced by certain Romantic traditions of performance, whatever the stringency of her musical scholarship; Landowska knew how to hold audiences breathless, and when she gave recitals, they responded with deathlike silence and rapt attention.
Okay, now the author emphasizes that considering WL as a classicist is incorrect. Rather, she her music is influenced by certain romantic tradition. You'll also notice that the author further continues this part in the second paragraph
Her playing was Romantic, but it was at least as close in spirit to the style of playing intended by composers of the Baroque (1600–1750) and Classical (1750–1830) eras, as have been the more exacting but less emotionally resonant interpretations of most harpsichordists since Landowska.
Now to the second para, As the author mentioned in his last sentence that playing of WL is romantic he says the same in the first part and says that her style of playing the music is as intended by the composers. i.e the music was composed for a harpsicord but was played by a harpsicordist and not by a pianist is more appropriate but less emotional as compared to a pianist playing it (remember the author talks about pianists provoking emotions in the first line)
Re: OG_VPR # 20/21/22/23 In the early twentieth century, the ide
[#permalink]
11 Jul 2022, 23:54
Expert Reply
Para 1- idea that pianists should be musician-scholars whose playing reflected the way composers wanted their music to sound replaced the notion that pianists should be virtuosos; Wanda Landowska- influenced by certain Romantic traditions Para 2- WL- miraculous quality of touch, a seemingly autonomous left hand Para 3- her entire musical approach was Romantic: intensely personal, full of light and shade, never pedantic. Para 4- Thanks to Landowska, Bach’s music (originally composed for the harpsichord) now sounded inappropriately thick when played on the piano; an emphasis on studying composers’ manuscript notations
1. The passage suggests that Landowska’s playing embodied a rejection of which of the following? E) Performances emphasizing showy displays of technique that compromise the integrity of a composer’s original score.- Correct, WL's playing serves to express the idea described in the first line-" pianists should be musician-scholars whose playing reflected the way composers wanted their music to sound replaced the notion that pianists should be virtuosos whose performances thrilled audiences with emotional daring and showy displays of technique" The last para describes preserving the integrity of composer's original score
2. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the compositions of Scarlatti? D) They were composed for instruments other than piano.
hen they gradually stopped performing any kind of Baroque music on the piano, even Scarlatti’s. The piano repertoire, it began to be felt, was extensive enough without reverting to transcriptions of Baroque music originally written for the harpsichord
3. The passage suggests that Landowska would probably have objected most strongly to which of the following? We know that "performers should use the instrument for which the music was originally written"
A) A performance of a Bach keyboard piece played on the harpsichord. B) A performance of a Handel organ piece on a Baroque pipe organ.- incorrect C) A modern composition written for a harpsichord and two pianos.- incorrect D) A piano solo in which the performer occasionally departs from the tempo indicated by the composer.- incorrect E) A performance of a piano and violin sonata in which the piano part is played on the harpsichord.
I was down to options A and E and chose option A. But I think we might be able to eliminate option A because of "Thanks to Landowska, Bach’s music (originally composed for the harpsichord) now sounded inappropriately thick when played on the piano."
4. The author’s assertion that Landowska should not be considered a classicist serves primarily to emphasize which of the following? C) Landowska’s musical performances were not devoid of emotion.- Correct
She had a miraculous quality of touch, a seemingly autonomous left hand; no artist in her generation could clarify with such deftness the polyphonic writing of the Baroque masters. And none could make their music so spring to life.
Re: OG_VPR # 20/21/22/23 In the early twentieth century, the ide
[#permalink]
23 Aug 2022, 08:36
Expert Reply
Thanks to Landowska, Bach’s music (originally composed for the harpsichord) now sounded inappropriately thick when played on the piano.
The music maybe was not suitable for playing it with the piano
One by one, pianists stopped playing Bach’s music as adapted for the piano by Liszt or by Tausig.
The two authors above adapted the Back music to play with the piano. Most of the musicians stopped to play though these adaptations of Bach
Then they gradually stopped performing any kind of Baroque music on the piano, even Scarlatti’s.
after that, they stopped to play ANY kind of music of that era: Baroque
The piano repertoire, it began to be felt, was extensive enough without reverting to transcriptions of Baroque music originally written for the harpsichord—and piano performances of Bach and Scarlatti were, despite the obvious similarities between the harpsichord and the piano, transcriptions, no matter how faithfully the original notes were played.
By ITSELF the music for piano was already huge, lot of operas, so it was a waste of time to adapt music conceived for another instrument or from another author such as Back to play on piano
In accordance with this kind of purism came an emphasis on studying composers’ manuscript notations, a relatively new field of musicology that is flourishing even today.
From the scenario in the previous sentence above, came out to study those compositions SPECIFICALLY created and conceived for the piano and NOt adapted from another author or instrument.
I hope now is more easy to grasp
gmatclubot
Re: OG_VPR # 20/21/22/23 In the early twentieth century, the ide [#permalink]