Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
Materials scientists have observed that, at cryogenic temperatures
[#permalink]
06 Jun 2021, 06:49
2
2
Bookmarks
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
Materials scientists have observed that, at cryogenic temperatures, certain metals develop qualities they do not possess in real world conditions, including superconductivity, a quality not seen even at the most glacial natural temperatures. Edgeworth’s theory postulates that when metals achieve superconductivity below 50 K (approximately -370° F), they retain their crystal structure – the arrangement of atoms composing the metal – with the extreme sub-zero temperatures enhancing the ability of electrons to transit this fixed structure. One primary mechanism appears to facilitate electron movement: rather than repelling each other as they do at normal temperatures, electrons pair up, permitting them to pack tightly and travel simultaneously through the metal in greater numbers. Through this cooperative action, electrons also overcome resistance, flowing without colliding into the crystal lattice. Unimpeded en masse movement of electrons is the essence of superconductivity.
Because not all metals become superconductors at low Kelvin temperatures, Edoardo and Wouters hypothesized that electron pairing only partially explains superconductivity. They, therefore, explored characteristics of the metals themselves. The physicists excluded the metal’s purity, given that various simple elements, compounds, and alloys achieve superconductivity. Instead, they focused on metallic bonding and each metal’s number of “free” electrons. At familiar temperatures, metals as a class are superior conductors because metal atoms bond in such a way that certain electrons float freely rather than tightly orbiting their individual atoms, as electrons do in other materials. The mobility of free electrons produces electrical conductivity. In theory, in artificial cold, the more available free electrons a metal has, the more it should be prone to become superconductive and the higher its maximum superconductivity should be. Edoardo and Wouters posited, however, that this ordering would not bear out based on their calculations showing a finite capacity for electron flow through any material, even factoring in electron pairing.
After cooling over 250 metals, Edoardo and Wouters observed that cryogenic conditions affected not only the electrons (whether those introduced by the electric current or the naturally occurring free electrons present in the metal), but also the metal’s lattice structure. When plunged into deep cold, some metals that are highly conductive at room temperature did not become superconductors, some became average superconductors, and some became superior superconductors. The number of free electrons was a less important factor than the ability of the crystal lattice to continuously synchronize its spacing with the passage of electrons through the structure. This resonant “breathing” of the lattice both complemented and enhanced the effects of electron pairing.
Edoardo and Wouters’ discovery significantly advances understanding of superconductivity. Lattice-electron interaction raises the possibility that indefinite numbers of electrons can flow through a substance in the right conditions; the supposed mathematical limit was proven false. Additionally, debunking the conductivity hierarchy spurs experimentation with non-metal crystalline materials, even those not conductive at standard temperatures, to explore their superconductive potential. A material’s ability to eliminate its own resistance may be as crucial to superconductivity as electron pairing.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
53% (03:31) correct
47% (03:05) wrong based on 30 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A) support a contention that both metals and other materials can act as superconductors B) challenge the findings of a particular study of the properties of a specific class of materials C) contrast two hypotheses about the behavior of certain subatomic particles D) evaluate the methodology of certain material sciences experiments E) reveal an overlooked factor that contributes to an established phenomenon
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
53% (01:51) correct
47% (01:56) wrong based on 30 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
2. Which of the following can be inferred about the metals studied in Edoardo and Wouter’s experiments?
A) The metals with the most free electrons at room temperature become superior superconductors at cryogenic temperatures. B) At artificially low temperatures, the crystal structures of certain metals respond more dynamically to the movement of electrons than they would in a natural setting. C) The metals with the tightest spacing in their lattice structures at room temperature did not become superconductors at cryogenic temperatures. D) Cryogenic temperatures had a more profound impact on electrons involved in metallic bonding than on those involved in electricity transport. E) The metals transformed from solids to more fluid materials when plunged into deep cold conditions.
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
6% (01:24) correct
94% (01:17) wrong based on 31 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
3. Which of the following best describes the purpose of the highlighted sentences?
A) They present the basis for a theory about why metals are composed of crystal lattices. B) They identify factors that potentially affect superconductivity in metals. C) They refute a hypothesis about how metals will rank as superconductors. D) They explain a quality that metals possess in natural conditions. E) They elucidate the phenomenon of electron pairing.
Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
Question Stats:
21% (01:16) correct
79% (01:10) wrong based on 24 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
4. For the following question, consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
Which of the following is true about electron pairing based on the passage?
A) Free electrons do not pair with electrons introduced to the metal by an outside current. B) Electrons may be able to overcome their mutual repulsion in materials other than metals. C) Paired electrons are able to maneuver in ways that unpaired electrons cannot.
Re: Materials scientists have observed that, at cryogenic temperatures
[#permalink]
07 Jun 2021, 22:40
1
For question 3: I think that the answer should be C rather than D. Here is my explanation: They explain a quality that metals possess in natural conditions. they have constructed artificial cold and then they talk about how the metals that were conductive at the normal or the natural temps didn't translate to super conductors. This does not explain the a characteristics of the metals at the normal temperature because at the normal temperature the current is due to the free electrons and at the cryogenic the current is more due to the lattice to continuously synchronize its spacing with the passage of electrons through the structure. Whereas in C it says that it refute a hypothesis about how metals will rank as superconductors. This is appropriate because in the previous passage they have given that Edoardo and Wouters posited, however, that this ordering would not bear out based on their calculations showing a finite capacity for electron flow through any material, even factoring in electron pairing. There should be more than electron pairing but the electron pairing explanation is the current hypo so it refutes it. Also The number of free electrons was a less important factor than the ability of the crystal lattice to continuously synchronize its spacing with the passage of electrons through the structure.
Re: Materials scientists have observed that, at cryogenic temperatures
[#permalink]
07 Jun 2021, 22:46
1
For question 4: We can simply eliminate A because it is not referenced in the passage. For B it is true because of the line:The physicists excluded the metal’s purity, given that various simple elements, compounds, and alloys achieve superconductivity. For C we can give it true from the line:with the extreme sub-zero temperatures enhancing the ability of electrons to transit this fixed structure. One primary mechanism appears to facilitate electron movement: rather than repelling each other as they do at normal temperatures, electrons pair up, permitting them to pack tightly and travel simultaneously through the metal in greater numbers.
Re: Materials scientists have observed that, at cryogenic temperatures
[#permalink]
02 Jul 2021, 11:36
taskforce wrote:
For question 3: I think that the answer should be C rather than D. Here is my explanation: They explain a quality that metals possess in natural conditions. they have constructed artificial cold and then they talk about how the metals that were conductive at the normal or the natural temps didn't translate to super conductors. This does not explain the a characteristics of the metals at the normal temperature because at the normal temperature the current is due to the free electrons and at the cryogenic the current is more due to the lattice to continuously synchronize its spacing with the passage of electrons through the structure. Whereas in C it says that it refute a hypothesis about how metals will rank as superconductors. This is appropriate because in the previous passage they have given that Edoardo and Wouters posited, however, that this ordering would not bear out based on their calculations showing a finite capacity for electron flow through any material, even factoring in electron pairing. There should be more than electron pairing but the electron pairing explanation is the current hypo so it refutes it. Also The number of free electrons was a less important factor than the ability of the crystal lattice to continuously synchronize its spacing with the passage of electrons through the structure.
Here's how I would look at it. The sentence has to be viewed in the context of the sentence before it and the one after it.
The sentence before it introduces the lattice structure of a metal, which is an intrinsic property metals have in natural conditions. The sentence after it states how the lattice property is more important than the number of free electrons in generating the conductive properties observed at cryogenic temperatures. In essence, what we need is a sentence that provides an explanation to bridge the gap between the introduction of the property and the assertion of its relevance.
Just my 2c.
Cheers!
gmatclubot
Re: Materials scientists have observed that, at cryogenic temperatures [#permalink]