“Some people believe that in order to be effective. political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. “


Concerning what political parties must to use as a basis to make important decisions in order to be effective in the society, people do not see eyes to eyes. Many people believe that leader must listen to the publics’ opinions and change ideas. On the contrary to the first communities, others have strong belief that successful leaders are who, well-established their words. I strongly contend that political members should be deep-rooted in their own strategies without altering their words which I buttress my position by augmenting meticulous assumptions.

The first reason is that this approach would make trust among general publics as political leaders are consistent towards their established arguments and they are confident that their discussion will produce positive outcomes. In addition, ample people react to sensitive situations emotionally and they are not adroit to make proper decisions. To clarify this position, people may have pathetic reactions to issues related to the war. However, political communities have apropos knowledge and experience about protecting countries from the hostility arguments and they may hold strong opinions that the solely option to protect country from interfering other nations is to be contentious toward each other.

Another equally important reason is that political parties analyze both advantages and disadvantages of strategies before disseminating the news to publics, so leaders should not react emotionally to news in order to attract the attention of general people. It is conspicuous that publics believe the specific leader’s principles after voting to choose him, so the governors should not apply any methods in order to intrigue people by modifying views. In addition, it may hamper people’s trust by altering beliefs because people felt confident towards the first strategies and assumptions, so changing the first argument may result in discrediting and chaos among people. It is more likely individuals try to organize disparate communities in order to change country’s situations and it may produce disorganized status. To illustrate this case, evaluating the situation of one of developing counties such as Turkey where the power of social people is more established than that of political leaders in 2016, heretic people who was iconoclastic towards Erdogan and Islamic people tries to change county’s position by being more robust parties.

However, what I stated above. myriad people believe that political groups should make decisions in accord with listening to publics’ views in order to be prosperous. It is not duplicity to adopt their positions in the different periods and it is apparent old principles may not apply to the modern times as the conditions and rules are not comparable. Governments should consider publics claims in order to solve their problems and abandon any kinds of turbulence conditions. But I personally believe that governors should not answer all of the acclaims immediately and they have responsibility to evaluate pros and cons, analyze their cooperated and opposition parties’ discussions at the same time and try to find a stable answer which deals with publics’ problems and ameliorate the whole situation of the society. By following these steps, leaders can seize opportunity to accurately set new standards. However, establishing fresh strategies needs to consider many consecutive years.




To sum up, there are different views about defining and denoting the leadership. Many people argue that political people should emphasize their own assumption in order to be a successful group. On the other hand, Others think that political parties have responsibility towards people’s difficulties and the rules must be changed which focusing on public’ attitudes. I personally agree that governments should have deep-rooted beliefs towards their own tale stories, However, it is wrong to assume that governors should ignore and nullify general people’s considerations.