GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
QOTD #12 In the 1960s, Northwestern University sociologist J
[#permalink]
30 Nov 2021, 10:57
30 Nov 2021, 10:57
1
Expert Reply
The passage says
With no access to mortgages, residents within the red line suffered low property values and landlord abandonment;
No mortgage >>> plummeting properties value
Also, access to mortgage >>> higher value
So the third is true
We do not know if other variables are implied to increase or decrease the value. However, we must adhere to what is written in the passage and what the question is asking us.
Other assumptions, reasoning are out of scope. Totally
We must reply to the question: can we infer this ?? Yes or not. That's it
With no access to mortgages, residents within the red line suffered low property values and landlord abandonment;
No mortgage >>> plummeting properties value
Also, access to mortgage >>> higher value
So the third is true
We do not know if other variables are implied to increase or decrease the value. However, we must adhere to what is written in the passage and what the question is asking us.
Other assumptions, reasoning are out of scope. Totally
We must reply to the question: can we infer this ?? Yes or not. That's it
gmatclubot
QOTD #12 In the 1960s, Northwestern University sociologist J [#permalink]
30 Nov 2021, 10:57
Moderators:
|
|
||
