GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Seeing its only alternative to be a (i) _________ diplomacy unbecoming
[#permalink]
19 Apr 2023, 23:44
19 Apr 2023, 23:44
Expert Reply
4
Bookmarks
00:00
Question Stats:
24% (01:02) correct
75% (01:21) wrong based on 77 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Seeing its only alternative to be a (i) _________ diplomacy unbecoming of political visionaries—as members of the so-called National Liberation Organization saw themselves in those days—the militant branch veered toward a policy of (ii) _________ aggression against its perceived ethnic rivals.
| Blank (i) | Blank (ii) |
|---|---|
| A. wheedling | D. supine |
| B. freewheeling | E. unremitting |
| C. verdant | F. superfluous |
[#permalink]
24 Apr 2023, 04:45
24 Apr 2023, 04:45
1
Expert Reply
OE
Wheedling, unremitting. What would seem to be unbecoming of political visionaries is to attempt to convince someone (rather than, say, commanding or dictating terms), especially in a flattering way. That's exactly what wheedling means.
Freewheeling (acting without concern for rules or consequences) is not indicated by any clues in the sentence, and verdant (green, covered in vegetation) is totally unrelated to diplomacy. You have no indication that the aggression undertaken was superfluous (unnecessary); if so, why would they undertake it? A “policy of supine (passive; apathetic) aggression” would be contradictory. Rather, it was persistent or relentless (unremitting).
Wheedling, unremitting. What would seem to be unbecoming of political visionaries is to attempt to convince someone (rather than, say, commanding or dictating terms), especially in a flattering way. That's exactly what wheedling means.
Freewheeling (acting without concern for rules or consequences) is not indicated by any clues in the sentence, and verdant (green, covered in vegetation) is totally unrelated to diplomacy. You have no indication that the aggression undertaken was superfluous (unnecessary); if so, why would they undertake it? A “policy of supine (passive; apathetic) aggression” would be contradictory. Rather, it was persistent or relentless (unremitting).
gmatclubot
24 Apr 2023, 04:45
Moderators:
