GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 28Live Online Class with Top GRE Expert Mike Butville
08:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GRE course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP GRE OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon/Wed Sept. 28, 2026 - Dec. 9, 2026, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
The movie critic was best remembered for the way he used the language
[#permalink]
14 May 2023, 14:19
14 May 2023, 14:19
Expert Reply
00:00
Question Stats:
39% (00:35) correct
60% (00:45) wrong based on 38 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
The movie critic was best remembered for the way he used the language of food to describe films, for example, how he praised Iñarritu’s action sequences by comparing them to a _____________ empanada.
| Two Answers |
|---|
| A. insipid |
| B. spectacular |
| C. brilliant | D. piquant | E. zesty |
| F. stupefying |
Re: The movie critic was best remembered for the way he used the language
[#permalink]
16 May 2023, 04:00
16 May 2023, 04:00
Expert Reply
OE
piquant, zesty There are two important portions of this sentence to focus on. First, the word “praised,” implying that the critic’s review will be positive. The second part is the way he’s described as using “the language of food to describe films.” So you want two words that are positive and that could also be used to describe food. Spectacular and stupefying are an incorrect pair. They are both positive, but they aren’t generally used to describe food. Insipid (bland, tasteless, or flavorless) and brilliant have no relationship, and insipid is the opposite of what is needed in the blank.
piquant, zesty There are two important portions of this sentence to focus on. First, the word “praised,” implying that the critic’s review will be positive. The second part is the way he’s described as using “the language of food to describe films.” So you want two words that are positive and that could also be used to describe food. Spectacular and stupefying are an incorrect pair. They are both positive, but they aren’t generally used to describe food. Insipid (bland, tasteless, or flavorless) and brilliant have no relationship, and insipid is the opposite of what is needed in the blank.
gmatclubot
Re: The movie critic was best remembered for the way he used the language [#permalink]
16 May 2023, 04:00
Moderators:
