GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 17Live Online Classes with Top GRE Expert Rich Zwelling
08:00 PM EST
-10:00 PM EST
Get live instruction from a top-scoring, industry-recognized GRE teachers + 6 months of access to TTP Self-Study included! Tues/Thur Sept 7, 2026---Feb. 2, 2027, 1:00pm-3:00pm EST
Dec 14Live Online Classes with Top GRE Expert Michael Butville
08:00 PM EST
-10:00 PM EST
Get live instruction from a top-scoring, industry-recognized GRE teachers + 6 months of access to TTP Self-Study included! Mon/Wed Dec. 14, 2026---Feb. 22, 2027, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
The original price of a suit was 30 percent less than the su
[#permalink]
07 Mar 2018, 14:31
07 Mar 2018, 14:31
1
Expert Reply
00:00
Question Stats:
95% (01:04) correct
4% (00:55) wrong based on 44 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
The original price of a suit was 30 percent less than the suit’s $250 suggested retail price. The price at which the suit was sold was 20 percent less than the original price.
A) Quantity A is greater.
B) Quantity B is greater.
C) The two quantities are equal.
D) The relationship cannot be determined from the information given.
Kudos to the right solution and explanation
Quantity A |
Quantity B |
The price at which the suit was sold |
50% of the suit’s suggested retail price |
A) Quantity A is greater.
B) Quantity B is greater.
C) The two quantities are equal.
D) The relationship cannot be determined from the information given.
Kudos to the right solution and explanation
Sherpa Prep Representative
Joined: 15 Jan 2018
Posts: 147
Given Kudos: 0
Re: The original price of a suit was 30 percent less than the su
[#permalink]
07 Mar 2018, 19:57
07 Mar 2018, 19:57
2
Expert Reply
For Quantity A, the original price is equal to 30% less than $250, which means 70% of $250, which translates as .7x$250. The selling price was 20% below that, which means 80% of that, which translates as .8x.7x$250.
For Quantity B, 50% of the $250 translates as .5x$250.
So we have an inequality:
.8x.7x$250 vs. .5x$250
We can divide out the $250 and ignore it, leaving us with .8x.7 vs. .5. Since .8x.7 equals .56, A must be bigger.
For Quantity B, 50% of the $250 translates as .5x$250.
So we have an inequality:
.8x.7x$250 vs. .5x$250
We can divide out the $250 and ignore it, leaving us with .8x.7 vs. .5. Since .8x.7 equals .56, A must be bigger.
Re: The original price of a suit was 30 percent less than the su
[#permalink]
07 Mar 2018, 20:19
07 Mar 2018, 20:19
2
correct: A
The original price of a suit was 30 percent less than the suit’s $250 suggested retail price:
original+price = retail - retail *30% . while retail is $250 so
original+price = 0.7 * retail = 0.7 * $250 = $175
The price at which the suit was sold was 20 percent less than the original price.
sold_price = original_price - 0.2 * original_price = 0.8 * original_price = 0.8 * $175 = $140
A: The price at which the suit was sold: $140
B: 50% of the suit’s suggested retail price: 0.5* retail = 0.5 * $250 = $125
so A is bigger than B and the answer is A
The original price of a suit was 30 percent less than the suit’s $250 suggested retail price:
original+price = retail - retail *30% . while retail is $250 so
original+price = 0.7 * retail = 0.7 * $250 = $175
The price at which the suit was sold was 20 percent less than the original price.
sold_price = original_price - 0.2 * original_price = 0.8 * original_price = 0.8 * $175 = $140
A: The price at which the suit was sold: $140
B: 50% of the suit’s suggested retail price: 0.5* retail = 0.5 * $250 = $125
so A is bigger than B and the answer is A
