Last visit was: 16 Sep 2026, 14:18 It is currently 16 Sep 2026, 14:18

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36150
Own Kudos [?]: 43324 [0]
Given Kudos: 27249
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36150
Own Kudos [?]: 43324 [1]
Given Kudos: 27249
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36150
Own Kudos [?]: 43324 [0]
Given Kudos: 27249
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36150
Own Kudos [?]: 43324 [0]
Given Kudos: 27249
Send PM
"The Polish Rider," ostensibly painted by the legendary Rembrandt van [#permalink]
Expert Reply
EXPLANATION QUESTION #3


Correct answer: D

The passage explains that the forger used "a wide brush" with "a few drops of paint" spread thinly into a broad, loose stroke. Because there was "insufficient paint on the brush to cover the canvas from the stroke's start to finish," the strokes became rough and shallow, producing streaked bands and "a ghastly illusion of emaciated horse skin over bone." The direct mechanical cause of the emaciated look is not enough paint on the brush; therefore, putting more paint on the brush would have prevented this appearance. So D is correct.

A is too vague and not tied to the specific mechanical cause identified.
B contradicts the passage: the issue is not that he wished to paint "painterly," but that he overdid it and used too little paint.
C is not mentioned.
E is the opposite of what is described; the passage says he tried to make strokes "looser and less distinct," but overdid this with too little paint.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36150
Own Kudos [?]: 43324 [0]
Given Kudos: 27249
Send PM
Re: "The Polish Rider," ostensibly painted by the legendary Rembrandt van [#permalink]
Expert Reply
EXPLANATION QUESTION #4

Why only B is supported
Statement B:
"The forger was aware of the various nuances of Rembrandt's painting style, but he failed to replicate the same accurately in his painting."

The passage explicitly supports both parts of this:
- Awareness: "Polish Rider seems a studied attempt to copy Rembrandt's style," and the author states the artist "must have known" that Rembrandt's style became more "painterly" over time and tried to imitate that. gre.myprepclub
- Failure to replicate accurately: those attempts are described as "overdone" and producing "imperfect results," such as the exaggerated, streaked brushwork and the emaciated look of the horse. gre.myprepclub

So B matches what the author actually says.
Why C is not supported
Statement C:
"Had the forger not tried too hard to make the painting look authentic, the painting would not have been deattributed."

Why C is not supported
Statement C:
"Had the forger not tried too hard to make the painting look authentic, the painting would not have been deattributed."

The text does say:
- "Like all forgeries, it has the telltale signs of trying too hard." gre.myprepclub
- Features that look like flaws can be seen as "a calculated but overdone attempt to reproduce Rembrandt's artistic flourishes, with imperfect results." gre.myprepclub

But the claim in C is much stronger: it says that the absence of "trying too hard" would have prevented deattribution. That requires two extra assumptions the passage never makes:
- That these "trying too hard" features are the decisive or only reason for deattribution.
- That without them, experts would have accepted the painting as authentic.

The author never says the deattribution was based solely on these overdone features, nor that the painting would not have been deattributed otherwise. He just offers an explanation of the flaws if we view the painting as a forgery. That is not enough to justify the strong counterfactual in C. On a strict GRE-style inference standard, this goes beyond the text, so C is not supported.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: "The Polish Rider," ostensibly painted by the legendary Rembrandt van [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
275 posts
GRE Instructor
1151 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne