1. The author implies that a possibly negative aspect of the Treaty of Utrecht was
To answer this, it'll be best to go to the part of the passage and re-read the part about the consequences of the Treaty of Utrecht (skim for mention of the treaty--it's in para. 2). Note what's said about the treaty:
- it ended the War of Spanish Succession in 1714
- it ceded Gibraltar to England
- it elevated Prussia to a kingdom

Then, decide which of these things is most negative. Ending a war is (presumably) a good thing, so that one's out like a trout. Ceding Gibraltar to England? That's a bit controversial in modern times, but the passage doesn't comment on it except to say that it proved "invincible" later on, so if anything, this is a positive aspect of the Treaty of Utrecht (maybe not to enemies of the Crown...). The passage does say that elevating Prussia to a kingdom set in motion a chain of events that arguably made the bloodshed that consumed the 20th century more likely, and bloodshed does sound a bit negative (maybe not to vampires?), so this is likely what the question is after. Find an answer that matches.

(A) awarding Gibraltar to the British
(B) reducing the Duke of Marlborough to obscurity
(C) elevating Prussia to a kingdom
(D) failing to resolve the Spanish succession
(E) unifying Germany

(C) clearly matches the prediction. You might wonder what makes this an inference question rather than an "according to the passage" question. Essentially, it's just that you have to connect some structural dots to choose (C)--the passage doesn't outright say that this was a bad thing, and it doesn't immediately say that elevating Prussia led to bloodshed. It's up to you (yes: you) to make the connection.


2. Which of the following must be true, according to the passage?
Unlike the last question, this one doesn't give us any specific details to latch onto. In these cases, it's usually a good idea to start by scanning the answers and seeing if there are any that are obviously wrong (or obviously right--fingers crossed).

(A) Not all of the important military personages were from major powers.
This is plausible. There were military personages mentioned in the first paragraph, and it's hard to say what kind of powers they were from. Keep this for a minute.

(B) The battle of Blenheim was the most important engagement of the war.
This one's pretty suspicious: was it the most important engagement of the war? Hyperbolic answers such as this one often go by the wayside, especially when the question stem is open-ended. You're on the bubble, (B).

(C) England was the victorious power.
This seems more plausible than the previous answer (watching you, (B)), but you might remember from the research done on the previous question that Prussia also won some sort of victory, inasmuch as it was elevated to a kingdom as a result of the war. That makes an answer calling England the victorious power a bit hard to choose.

(D) France was defeated in the war.
This, again, might be right, and unlike (C), it doesn't single France out as the defeated power, so keep it around for later analysis.

(E) The transfer of Gibraltar was the most important result of the war.
Again, this one's a bit hyperbolic, so it's significantly less likely to be right. Also again, you know from the previous question that the elevation of Prussia to *kingdom status* led to big dramatic vampire-pleasing things in the 20th century, so that might have been the most important result of the war. This one's definitely not looking good.

Coming away from this first run through the answers, (A) and (C) emerge as the most promising among them. At this point, it's a good idea to go back to the passage and research the details mentioned in (A) and (C) more carefully:
[list]Where did the military personages come from? At least one was from Savoy, a place described as an independent territory east of France and not listed among the major powers in the previous sentence. This answer looks promising.

Did France lose the war? You know by that Spain lost something (Gibraltar, once fondly known as the Pillars of Heracles) to England, and you know that Prussia (a power listed on the same side as England) also won something big in the Treaty of Utrecht, which is almost definitely a real place. Therefore, it's pretty fair to assume that Spain lost a bit and that England and Prussia were on the winning side of things. However, nothing is specifically mentioned about France besides a low-key panegyric on Louis XIV. It's possible that France fought this one to a draw. And given that it's undeniable that answer (A) has some affirmative backing in the passage, you shouldn't choose this unsubstantiated (in either direction) answer over it.

The correct answer is (A).