what is the answer??

I'm thinking of innocuous,deleterious,label but i'm not sure about the right answer

Added the OA.

Ask for further assistance.

Regards

I was thinking last one would be G. platform. It makes sense that demeaning comments will be harmful to political party's platform. Label also makes sense but I am really confused between the two here.

A political platform is the core set of beliefs of a party. A political label would be the outward apparence of the group. While you could say that something could be bad for the core beliefs, you really would want to be saying something more like "it goes against the core beliefs" or "it makes the core beliefs looks bad/wrong." Saying that something could be bad for the outward apperance of your political party makes more sense here. While i think you could argue political platform being a sensible answer, I, label, is simply more correct.

So how can platform be both sensible and incorrect?

I find "label" very ambiguous even in context. It's very easy to argue that a label denotes what the party is made up of or what it represents, just like a platform would.

Nope. It should be B, F, G. He already is saying something very negative. It makes more sense if he is adding insult to injury by having his insulting or demeaning statement, ADDITIONALLY, irrelevant to his party's platform. A "label," implies something that is advertised often as something to be sold. Ok, yes, I get it, but "platform," is a more accurate term describing a political party's position or stance on political issues, a position taken to appeal to a certain set of voters that the party in question is trying to attract, convince, or enlist for support.

Sorry, I meant to say B,E, G. Steve

Political label is cheap and sounds unnatural.

I think "deleterious to the party’s political label” would mean his comments harmed the way the party was perceived or branded. That’s grammatical, but weaker and less precise than “platform,” which directly refers to the party’s official policies.

The completed sentence is:
Though the candidate insisted that his comments were (i) innocuous, many of his supporters were offended by his attitude, which they considered not only demeaning but (ii) deleterious to their party's political (iii) platform, and called for him to step down as the party's candidate.

Breakdown of the Blanks
- Blank (i): (B) innocuous

The sentence begins with "Though," which signals a contrast. The candidate insisted his comments were something, but his supporters were offended. This means the first word must be the opposite of what the supporters perceived his comments to be. Innocuous means not harmful or offensive. This word directly contrasts with the supporters' reaction of being offended and finding the comments "demeaning."
- Blank (ii): (F) deleterious

The second blank is part of a parallel structure: "not only demeaning but (ii) $\qquad$ ." Both words must describe a negative quality of the candidate's attitude. Deleterious means causing harm or damage. This word fits perfectly, as the supporters believed his attitude was harmful to the party.
- Blank (iii): (G) platform

The supporters believed the comments were harmful to their party's political something. The most logical word to describe a party's set of beliefs and goals is platform. A political platform is the stated agenda or set of principles a political party or candidate stands on.
The candidate's demeaning attitude would be seen as damaaing to this core identitv.