harpreetsingh1519 wrote:
Carcass wrote:
Conclusion: Farmsley centre is not the reason people are coming to downtown metropolis.
Prethinking: It is possible people came to downtown metropolis to shop and they just decided to watch the movie.
A. It actually supports the conclusion that farmsland is the reason people are spending more. Eliminate
B. Irrelevant
C. Out of scope
D. Irrelevant.
E. Correct. It is exactly in line with our prethinking.
Hence E
I would disagree with the above solution. The question is asking to show that Farmsley centre is the cause of the economic development in downtown area.
A- Weakens the conclusion.
B- Strengths the conclusion
c- Weakens
d- irrelevant
e- irrelevant
So Answer is B
Sorry Sir I overlooked the question because I was using my phone
We need to show an answer that is irrelevant to the gist of the problem.
1) We must say that the center is NOT a driver for businesses in the area
2) we do need an answer that impacts the LESS point 1
(A) People who do not attend a Farmsley Center show spend $103 on average when shopping in the downtown area.
yes this weaken People spend in the area for other reasons and not because attracted by the center
(B) Restaurants near the Farmsley Center tend to be more expensive than restaurants in other areas of the downtown.
The comparison among restaurants does not tell us anything.keep
(C) Most of the people who attend films or performances at the Farmsley Center do so because they are already in the area to shop.
They are ALREADY in the area. The center does not attract people. Weaken
(D) Tax revenues from all products and services sold in the downtown area have changed little in five years.
The center in not a driving force. Tax revenues are the same. Weaken
(E) Another downtown theatre is the only one large enough to show popular, newly released Hollywood films.
This is our driving force and NOT the center. Weaken
B is the answer
Hope this helps