Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 05:13 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 05:13

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Retired Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2020
Posts: 140
Own Kudos [?]: 308 [8]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2506
Own Kudos [?]: 3256 [0]
Given Kudos: 1051
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2020
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [0]
Given Kudos: 68
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 May 2021
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 385
Send PM
Re: In the Victorian era, critics tended to view the art of the Italian [#permalink]
Please provide an explanation for Q1?
How is it mentioned that modern writers were more nuanced in their critique of Renaissance artwork?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28658
Own Kudos [?]: 33139 [2]
Given Kudos: 25178
Send PM
In the Victorian era, critics tended to view the art of the Italian [#permalink]
2
Expert Reply
From thew first paragraph

In the Victorian era, critics tended to view the art of the Italian Renaissance through the prism of Enlightenment views about the role of the individual in the context of humanism (the ethical philosophy that holds that human life and agency have value separate from any supernatural or theistic beliefs). The celebration of the human form in Renaissance art was seen as a sign of a society ushering in an era of humanism; a new spirit of objectivity weakening the hold of religion was considered a major achievement of this era. However, recent scholarship on the subject has emphasized that the major works of Renaissance art seek to do more than simply extol the virtues of humanism. While many of the artists of the era do masterfully portray the human body, modern critics stress that their works also sought to glorify the principles underlying Christianity and the Roman Catholic Church, which commissioned a number of the most impressive works of the Renaissance. To what extent these artists intended to develop a humanistic version of Catholicism in their works, as opposed to simply portraying the trappings of Christian life as a means of disguising more subversive humanistic content, is open to question. However, those who have studied the art of the Italian Renaissance can attest to an undeniable air of reverence for the religious material found in many of these works. In 1999, Andrew Graham-Dixon published a book reviewing the Renaissance and the ideas behind it that supported the idea that these works were meant to convey more complex messages about humanism and its relationship to religion than imagined by many 19th century critics.

From the first paragraph we do know 3 things

1) The victorian critics stressed more on the fact that the artists of the Renaissance were inspired mainly by humanism

2) The modern critics said that there was an important humanism component but not only that. Also a huge component of Christianity

3) Both critics undeniably had an air of reverence


A) Modern critics are more reverent of Renaissance art than Victorian era critics were.

Both modern and victoria had a reverence. This is false

B) Modern critics focus more on depictions of the human body in Renaissance art than Victorian era critics did.

No false. The said that there was also a huge component of Christianity

C) Modern critics offer a more nuanced interpretation of the tension between humanism and religion in Renaissance art than Victorian era critics did.

yes true. of course. pretty simple: modern critics said humanity + religion

read carefully what you read. you must be able to understand and read the sentence that counts, eliminating the fille. I.E. connecting the dots

regards
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Nov 2021
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
In the Victorian era, critics tended to view the art of the Italian [#permalink]
Can someone explain why the answer of Q2 is not C?

And why is the answer B? Where is it mentioned that victorian era critics interpreted renaissance art through current lens??

Carcass
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28658
Own Kudos [?]: 33139 [1]
Given Kudos: 25178
Send PM
Re: In the Victorian era, critics tended to view the art of the Italian [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
This passage is a wild animal. Very intricated

Now, C is wrong because the democracies issue in the very end is just a detail. The second question is more related to the big picture of the passage as a whole

1) In the Victorian era, critics tended to view the art of the Italian Renaissance through the prism of Enlightenment views about the role of the individual in the context of humanism

2) However, recent scholarship on the subject has emphasized that the major works of Renaissance art seek to do more than simply extol the virtues of humanism.

3) modern critics stress that their works also sought to glorify the principles underlying Christianity and the Roman Catholic Church, which commissioned a number of the most impressive works of the Renaissance.

4) Andrew Graham-Dixon published a book reviewing the Renaissance and the ideas behind it that supported the idea that these works were meant to convey more complex messages about humanism and its relationship to religion than imagined by many 19th century critics.

5) The main problem with assessing the validity of critical appraisals such as Graham-Dixon’s is that it is difficult to analyze the multiple levels of meaning in major Renaissance artworks through the prism of contemporary issues.

From the excerpts above you must connect the dots.

Now: victorian said X

The modern said x+y

An example is a book by Graham-Dixon

however, point five, BOTH - and the book of Dixon is a clear example because he was a modern critic of the era (this is the key of the entire story to understand the second question) had a problem: Renaissance artworks through the prism of contemporary issues

B) both are prone to the tendency to interpret the art of the past through the lens of current concerns

B is the answer

Hope this helps
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
In the Victorian era, critics tended to view the art of the Italian [#permalink]
2
Summary:
Para 1: In the Italian art, relationship of religion and humanism was highly seen. 19th century critics sought to see art in a more complex manner

Para 2: That time didn’t have democracy as it is today and hence the perspective of viewers of that time is tenable


A1: (C) - a and b were wrong using POE
A2: (B) - Both critics view art from their own perspective
A3: (E) - Shortcomings of modern critics is that they try to search for deeper meanings in the art. But if option (e) is right, then the modern critics were correct with their thought process
A4: (B) - they perceive art with today’s circumstances
Prep Club for GRE Bot
[#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Instructor
218 posts
GRE Instructor
1029 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne