The importance of a well-balanced diet high in fiber and low in saturated fat is understood by most shoppers in Arcadia County. Moreover, food Line nutrition labels clearly display important nutritional information. As a result, sales of high-fiber foods in Arcadia County have risen dramatically during the last decade, while sales of foods high in saturated fat have dropped by a similar magnitude. Even so, during the last decade the number of shoppers in Arcadia County who are overweight has increased substantially. The more the residents of a city exercise, the lower the average number of heart attacks in that city. Likewise, the less the residents of a city exercise, the greater the average number of heart attacks in that city. Therefore, people who wish to reduce the chance of suffering a heart attack should exercise more.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
A. Heart attacks are a common cause of death in cities with high exercise rates.
B. The cities with low exercise rates are often those with the highest standards of living.
C. A particular resident of a city whose population has a high exercise rate may not exercise at all.
D. The cities with high exercise rates are also the cities with the lowest number of cigarette smokers.
E. The differences in exercise rates among cities often result from the availability of conveniently located gyms.
Post A Detailed Correct Solution For The Above Questions And Get Kudos.
Question From Our Project: Free GRE Prep Club Tests in Exchange for 20 Kudos\(\Longrightarrow\)
Free Materials for the GRE General Exam - Where to get it!!\(\Longrightarrow\)
Best GRE Test Books of 2023
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28746
Given Kudos: 25229
Re: The importance of a well-balanced diet high in fiber and low in satura
[#permalink]
10 Aug 2023, 09:00
OE
This weaken question addresses the conclusion of the passage, which states that "people who wish to reduce the chance of suffering a heart attack should exercise more." The argument presents a causal pattern, assuming that the correlation between average number of heart attacks and exercise rates is not a coincidence. If this correlation is a coincidence, then the argument's conclusion is weakened. Choice (A) can be eliminated as out of scope, as the passage discusses raising and lowering the risk of heart attack not whether heart attacks are a common cause of death. Choice (B) can be eliminated, as high standards of living cannot be supported to have an impact on the conclusion. Choice (C) is a reversal, as a resident who personally has a high exercise rate may not see a benefit from additional exercise, but one who does not exercise is more likely to see a benefit from exercise. Choice (E) is out of scope, as the reason for different exercise rates does not impact the conclusion. The correct answer is (D).
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2023
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 22
The importance of a well-balanced diet high in fiber and low in satura
[#permalink]
09 May 2024, 09:35
Wow, choice D, quite tricky!
But my question: Is it permitted in gre to make such a wide assumption of cigarette smoking as a cause of heart attack?
I would appreciate your clarification. Thank you
May 22
30% (02:47) correct
