GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
GRE - Issue Task - Claim: The best test of an argument is it
[#permalink]
03 May 2019, 06:51
03 May 2019, 06:51
Could you please grade my essay?
The best test of an argument is in its ability to convince its whole audience in favor of the argument, not just the audience with opposing view.
Discussions on the arguments on various topics are very important for the development of the knowledge of humankind. The argument is regarded as valid only when it is proved unanimously. The main point in this validity is, the argument have to be valid to all persons, like someone with a opposite viewpoint, or someone who has not yet formed an opinion about the argument. The just arguments are meaningful in a way that is necessary for development of humankind. These kinds of arguments are self-sufficient in nature. They don’t need an opposing view to denote their moment. The voting rights for women, or the tradition of slavery- have been passed as arguments first. When these arguments originated, there were opposing arguments present regarding these issues. Also, there were many persons who were not dogmatic to any views. To become valid, all these arguments had to be accepted by both schools of thought- the opposing views, and the unbiased views.
On the other hand, though the majority of arguments have its competition, some arguments might not have an opposing viewpoint. Humankind is reagarded as the best life form in the universe, or speaking truth is the virtue of a pious man- these arguments doesn’t have an opposing view. But, the absence of the opposite viewpoint doesn’t render these arguments valueless.
In the history, we can see the value of many arguments is cardinal, regardless of the presence of their opposing views. For example, the argument for movement for eradication of recism is self-sufficient. It is for the equality of all persons. It doesn’t need an opposing viewpoint to justify it’s importance.
There are some fields where defending the argument against some opposing arguments to prove its validity. These kinds of argument is prevalent in scientific fields. The arguments for how the universe was created had many views. Only after the discoverty of Hubble, the right argument has been established, and it has been established by defending against opposing views.
The best way to test an argument is testing its validity in the rightness of it. Defence against opposing viewpoint is only a part of its test
Quote:
Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The best test of an argument is in its ability to convince its whole audience in favor of the argument, not just the audience with opposing view.
Discussions on the arguments on various topics are very important for the development of the knowledge of humankind. The argument is regarded as valid only when it is proved unanimously. The main point in this validity is, the argument have to be valid to all persons, like someone with a opposite viewpoint, or someone who has not yet formed an opinion about the argument. The just arguments are meaningful in a way that is necessary for development of humankind. These kinds of arguments are self-sufficient in nature. They don’t need an opposing view to denote their moment. The voting rights for women, or the tradition of slavery- have been passed as arguments first. When these arguments originated, there were opposing arguments present regarding these issues. Also, there were many persons who were not dogmatic to any views. To become valid, all these arguments had to be accepted by both schools of thought- the opposing views, and the unbiased views.
On the other hand, though the majority of arguments have its competition, some arguments might not have an opposing viewpoint. Humankind is reagarded as the best life form in the universe, or speaking truth is the virtue of a pious man- these arguments doesn’t have an opposing view. But, the absence of the opposite viewpoint doesn’t render these arguments valueless.
In the history, we can see the value of many arguments is cardinal, regardless of the presence of their opposing views. For example, the argument for movement for eradication of recism is self-sufficient. It is for the equality of all persons. It doesn’t need an opposing viewpoint to justify it’s importance.
There are some fields where defending the argument against some opposing arguments to prove its validity. These kinds of argument is prevalent in scientific fields. The arguments for how the universe was created had many views. Only after the discoverty of Hubble, the right argument has been established, and it has been established by defending against opposing views.
The best way to test an argument is testing its validity in the rightness of it. Defence against opposing viewpoint is only a part of its test
Re: GRE Essay: Issue Task
[#permalink]
04 May 2019, 09:30
04 May 2019, 09:30
Expert Reply
Your essay has several flaws
redundant sentence and not well written
Should be : The best test for an argument should be the message that it conveys not only to the audience with an opposing view but also to an audience at large
Discussions on the arguments on various topics are very important for the development of the knowledge ofhumankind (or is a human being or is mankind).
The argument is regarded as valid only when it is proved unanimously. The main point inthis its validity is, the argument have to be valid to all persons, like someone with a opposite viewpoint, or someone who has not yet formed an opinion about the argument.
Fragment sentences: the sentence between the two commas is not clear what modifies.
The just arguments are meaningful in a way that is necessary for development of humankind. These kinds of arguments are self-sufficient in nature. They don’t need an opposing view to denote their moment. The voting rights for women, or the tradition of slavery- have been passed as arguments first. When these arguments originated, there were opposing arguments present regarding these issues. Also, there were many persons who were not dogmatic to any views. To become valid, all these arguments had to be accepted by both schools of thought- the opposing views, and the unbiased views.
Not so many clear examples to show your claims. Moreover, the word argument is repeated several times making the entire writing monotone
On the other hand, though the majority of arguments have its competition, some arguments might not have an opposing viewpoint. Humankind isreagarded regarded as the best life form in the universe, or speaking truth is the virtue of a pious man- these arguments doesn’t have an opposing view. But, the absence of the opposite viewpoint doesn’t render these arguments valueless.
In the history, we can see the value of many arguments is cardinal, regardless of the presence of their opposing views. For example, the argument for movement for eradication ofrecism racism is self-sufficient. It is for the equality of all persons. It doesn’t need an opposing viewpoint to justify its importance.
There are some fields where defending the argument against some opposing arguments to prove its validity. These kinds of argument is prevalent in scientific fields. The arguments for how the universe was created had many views. Only after the discoverty of Hubble, the right argument has been established, and it has been established by defending against opposing views.
Mainly, you are repeating the same concept over and over again
Please see my guide on how to write an essay graded 6.0 https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/the-defin ... -3426.html
Hope this helps.
Regards
- Its unfolding or structure is not very clear
- the sentence structures are confused and well formulated
- several spelling errors
Quote:
The best test of an argument is in its ability to convince its whole audience in favor of the argument, not just the audience with opposing view.
redundant sentence and not well written
Should be : The best test for an argument should be the message that it conveys not only to the audience with an opposing view but also to an audience at large
Discussions on the arguments on various topics are very important for the development of the knowledge of
The argument is regarded as valid only when it is proved unanimously. The main point in
Fragment sentences: the sentence between the two commas is not clear what modifies.
The just arguments are meaningful in a way that is necessary for development of humankind. These kinds of arguments are self-sufficient in nature. They don’t need an opposing view to denote their moment. The voting rights for women, or the tradition of slavery- have been passed as arguments first. When these arguments originated, there were opposing arguments present regarding these issues. Also, there were many persons who were not dogmatic to any views. To become valid, all these arguments had to be accepted by both schools of thought- the opposing views, and the unbiased views.
Not so many clear examples to show your claims. Moreover, the word argument is repeated several times making the entire writing monotone
On the other hand, though the majority of arguments have its competition, some arguments might not have an opposing viewpoint. Humankind is
In the history, we can see the value of many arguments is cardinal, regardless of the presence of their opposing views. For example, the argument for movement for eradication of
There are some fields where defending the argument against some opposing arguments to prove its validity. These kinds of argument is prevalent in scientific fields. The arguments for how the universe was created had many views. Only after the discoverty of Hubble, the right argument has been established, and it has been established by defending against opposing views.
Mainly, you are repeating the same concept over and over again
Please see my guide on how to write an essay graded 6.0 https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/the-defin ... -3426.html
Hope this helps.
Regards
gmatclubot
Re: GRE Essay: Issue Task [#permalink]
04 May 2019, 09:30
Moderators:
