GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 28Live Online Class with Top GRE Expert Mike Butville
08:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GRE course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP GRE OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon/Wed Sept. 28, 2026 - Dec. 9, 2026, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
In private litigation, an employer can be (1) $\qquad$ for the acts pe
[#permalink]
06 Apr 2025, 01:53
06 Apr 2025, 01:53
Expert Reply
1
Bookmarks
00:00
Question Stats:
38% (01:04) correct
61% (01:17) wrong based on 13 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
In private litigation, an employer can be (i) $\(\qquad\)$ for the acts performed by employees during the discharge of their duties. Such (ii) $\(\qquad\)$ founded on the assumption that the superior has power over the actions of the subordinates. In other words, it is presumed that the superior has the duty to control (iii) $\(\qquad\)$ .
| Blank (i) | Blank (ii) | Blank (iii) |
|---|---|---|
| A. inadvertently appreciated | D. misconceptions are | G. all litigants |
| B. surely redeemed | E. vicarious liability is | H. the raconteur |
| C. held responsible | F. objective criteria is | I. every transgression |
- Part of the project: GRE Quant & Verbal ADVANCED Daily Challenge 2025 NEW Edition - Gain 20 Kudos & Get FREE Access to GRE Prep Club TESTS
- Also replying to the unanswered questions
Re: In private litigation, an employer can be (1) $\qquad$ for the acts pe
[#permalink]
10 Apr 2025, 04:00
10 Apr 2025, 04:00
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
The second sentence of the text provides the clue to the missing words in both blank 1 and blank 2 . The second sentence puts forth the assumption that the employer has power over the actions of the subordinates. This suggests that 'held responsible' fits in blank 1 and 'vicarious liability' (because the employer is indirectly held responsible for the acts of the employees) best fits in blank 2. Finally, the overall tone of the text suggests that 'every transgression' is apt in blank 3. Thus, the answer is C, E, I.
The second sentence of the text provides the clue to the missing words in both blank 1 and blank 2 . The second sentence puts forth the assumption that the employer has power over the actions of the subordinates. This suggests that 'held responsible' fits in blank 1 and 'vicarious liability' (because the employer is indirectly held responsible for the acts of the employees) best fits in blank 2. Finally, the overall tone of the text suggests that 'every transgression' is apt in blank 3. Thus, the answer is C, E, I.
gmatclubot
Re: In private litigation, an employer can be (1) $\qquad$ for the acts pe [#permalink]
10 Apr 2025, 04:00
Moderators:
