Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 11:06 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 11:06

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 07 Jun 2014
Posts: 4810
Own Kudos [?]: 10616 [7]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q167 V156
WE:Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Most Helpful Community Reply
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 6218
Own Kudos [?]: 11691 [6]
Given Kudos: 136
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2018
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 07 Jun 2014
Posts: 4810
Own Kudos [?]: 10616 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q167 V156
WE:Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
2
Expert Reply
snowbrood wrote:
why did u omit option A 16 is also correct along with option B and option C as 16 means 2*2*2*2 and the multiples are 8 14 33 which have factors 2*2*2*(2*7)*(3*11) or am i missing something


No 16 is not a factor.

We can rewrite the numbers in terms of factors:

\(8 = 2^3\)

\(14 = 2\times 7\)

\(33 = 3^11\)

So X must have = 2^3 \times 3 \times 7 \times 11.

\(16= 2^4\) This may not be a factor. For example, 1848 is a possible value of X but \(\frac{1848}{16}=115.5\)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Jan 2020
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
sandy wrote:
snowbrood wrote:
why did u omit option A 16 is also correct along with option B and option C as 16 means 2*2*2*2 and the multiples are 8 14 33 which have factors 2*2*2*(2*7)*(3*11) or am i missing something


No 16 is not a factor.

We can rewrite the numbers in terms of factors:

\(8 = 2^3\)

\(14 = 2\times 7\)

\(33 = 3^11\)

So X must have = 2^3 \times 3 \times 7 \times 11.

\(16= 2^4\) This may not be a factor. For example, 1848 is a possible value of X but \(\frac{1848}{16}=115.5\)




But, 8*14*33 is 3696, which is a factor of 16. So why not option A?
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2020
Posts: 164
Own Kudos [?]: 200 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
Preetham wrote:
sandy wrote:
snowbrood wrote:
why did u omit option A 16 is also correct along with option B and option C as 16 means 2*2*2*2 and the multiples are 8 14 33 which have factors 2*2*2*(2*7)*(3*11) or am i missing something


No 16 is not a factor.

We can rewrite the numbers in terms of factors:

\(8 = 2^3\)

\(14 = 2\times 7\)

\(33 = 3^11\)

So X must have = 2^3 \times 3 \times 7 \times 11.


\(16= 2^4\) This may not be a factor. For example, 1848 is a possible value of X but \(\frac{1848}{16}=115.5\)




But, 8*14*33 is 3696, which is a factor of 16. So why not option A?


As shown above, 16 does not satisfy the condition all times, For instance, when divided by 3696, it gives us a factor, but in case of 1848 it doesn't. Similarly, the other two numbers (24,77) always satisfy the condition.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Mar 2020
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
BUT HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT 16 WILL NOT BE INCLUDED
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2020
Posts: 164
Own Kudos [?]: 200 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
1
akkaur0310 wrote:
BUT HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT 16 WILL NOT BE INCLUDED


Sir, this is a hard question due to the fact that it has a trap in it. We need to crosscheck each and every option before selecting the answer. In this case, if one does not crosscheck for other numbers which have same multiples (like 1848), then they've fallen for the trap.
You're not supposed to know everything, such questions check how aware you're of the fact that there are other multiples of the given number other than 3696.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
Can anyone explain elaborately.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
1
sukrut96 wrote:
akkaur0310 wrote:
BUT HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT 16 WILL NOT BE INCLUDED


Sir, this is a hard question due to the fact that it has a trap in it. We need to crosscheck each and every option before selecting the answer. In this case, if one does not crosscheck for other numbers which have same multiples (like 1848), then they've fallen for the trap.
You're not supposed to know everything, such questions check how aware you're of the fact that there are other multiples of the given number other than 3696.



I see one simple way of doing this. just take the LCM of all the multiple and then check for factors
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
Hey, I have a problem understanding the formulation of this question.

'An integer X is a multiple of 8, 14 and 33. WHich of the following is a factor of X.'

Answers B and C are definitely correct.
But why A and D cannot also be a factor?
It doesn't mention that 8, 14, and 33 are the only multiple factors of X. I would understand it if at some way,
the question would limit it to 'only'.
I think this is also what other people here had a problem with.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28658
Own Kudos [?]: 33141 [0]
Given Kudos: 25178
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
When a number is a multiple of other numbers X,Y,and Z it must be at the intersection of those numbers that has all the factors that in the end X will contain.

It is like a building block of a wall: you take a brick here and there and when you complete the puzzle you will have X

To have x you nee the 2,3,7, and 11 or a combination of these

A and D does not have

A has one the two
D has only the three

Please refer to the following https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/gre-ma ... tml#p95905
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Jan 2024
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
why is a 4th 2 not included in X = (2)(2)..... when considering the prime factorization of 14?

for example, why is X not (2)(2)(2)(2)(7)(3)(11)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: An integer X is a multiple of 8 [#permalink]
Shouldn't this question contain the word 'MUST'?

"An integer X is a multiple of 8, 14 and 33. Which of the following 'MUST BE' a factor of X."

Otherwise all answers can be correct.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
[#permalink]
Moderators:
Moderator
1085 posts
GRE Instructor
218 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne