GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 24Get an Extra 30% Off Target Test Prep Plans
08:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Grab 30% off any Target Test Prep GRE plan during our Flash Sale and join Brian and many other students who have used Target Test Prep to score high on the GRE. Just enter the coupon code FLASH30 at checkout to save big.
The population of the U.S. grew by 29% between 1979 and 2004, during w
[#permalink]
05 Dec 2022, 04:42
05 Dec 2022, 04:42
Expert Reply
4
Bookmarks
00:00
Question Stats:
25% (01:00) correct
75% (02:56) wrong based on 4 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Attachment:
GRE The population of the U.S. grew by 29% between.jpg [ 72.92 KiB | Viewed 982 times ]
The population of the U.S. grew by 29% between 1979 and 2004, during which time per capita energy consumption doubled. If average per capita energy used from coal was 25 MBTUs in 1979, which of the following are in the range of per capita energy, measured in MBTUs, provided by a single fossil fuel (coal, natural gas or oil) in 2004 ?
Indicate all such values.
12
25
37
41
61
79
Re: The population of the U.S. grew by 29% between 1979 and 2004, during w
[#permalink]
09 Dec 2022, 04:00
09 Dec 2022, 04:00
1
Expert Reply
OE
Ignore the population growth: The question is asked in per capita terms, so it’s asking about the population as a whole. Coal production was 25 in 1979, when, according to the graph, coal represented 27% of energy; since 25 is 27% of 92.6, the total energy was 92.6 in 1979, and double that, or 185.2, in 2004. The lower end of the range is oil, at about 17%, and 17% of 185.2 is about 31.5; the upper end of the range is coal, at about 34%, or about 63. Choices (C), (D), and (E) fall within the range.
Ignore the population growth: The question is asked in per capita terms, so it’s asking about the population as a whole. Coal production was 25 in 1979, when, according to the graph, coal represented 27% of energy; since 25 is 27% of 92.6, the total energy was 92.6 in 1979, and double that, or 185.2, in 2004. The lower end of the range is oil, at about 17%, and 17% of 185.2 is about 31.5; the upper end of the range is coal, at about 34%, or about 63. Choices (C), (D), and (E) fall within the range.
Re: The population of the U.S. grew by 29% between 1979 and 2004, during w
[#permalink]
18 Mar 2023, 07:27
18 Mar 2023, 07:27
Carcass wrote:
OE
Ignore the population growth: The question is asked in per capita terms, so it’s asking about the population as a whole. Coal production was 25 in 1979, when, according to the graph, coal represented 27% of energy; since 25 is 27% of 92.6, the total energy was 92.6 in 1979, and double that, or 185.2, in 2004. The lower end of the range is oil, at about 17%, and 17% of 185.2 is about 31.5; the upper end of the range is coal, at about 34%, or about 63. Choices (C), (D), and (E) fall within the range.
Ignore the population growth: The question is asked in per capita terms, so it’s asking about the population as a whole. Coal production was 25 in 1979, when, according to the graph, coal represented 27% of energy; since 25 is 27% of 92.6, the total energy was 92.6 in 1979, and double that, or 185.2, in 2004. The lower end of the range is oil, at about 17%, and 17% of 185.2 is about 31.5; the upper end of the range is coal, at about 34%, or about 63. Choices (C), (D), and (E) fall within the range.
I didn't understand why was 92.6 doubled?
