GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Which statement is true about comparing the enrollment of students in
[#permalink]
21 Jan 2022, 11:45
21 Jan 2022, 11:45
Expert Reply
2
Bookmarks
00:00
Question Stats:
42% (02:18) correct
57% (01:54) wrong based on 14 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Attachment:
GRE Chart.jpg [ 147.93 KiB | Viewed 2416 times ]
Which statement is true about comparing the enrollment of students in the liberal arts major from 2000 and 2004?
A. The enrollment rose by about 300 students.
B. The enrollment declined by about 300 students.
C. The enrollment rose by about 30 students.
D. The enrollment declined by about 30 students.
E. None of the above statements are true.
Re: Which statement is true about comparing the enrollment of students in
[#permalink]
24 Jan 2022, 06:18
24 Jan 2022, 06:18
Expert Reply
Re: Which statement is true about comparing the enrollment of students in
[#permalink]
26 Feb 2022, 00:58
26 Feb 2022, 00:58
1
Here is my take. I might be wrong. I am getting result over the expected one.
We combine all Future Plans for 2004 from first chart (Find Part-Time Employment + Find Full-Time Employment + Unsure + Transfer to Four Year Program)
==> ( 2 + 2 + 3 + 5) = 12.
Notice in the second chart, they have mentioned total number of student enrolled were 1780.
So by unitary method
Total 12 bar levels is 1780. So 1 bar level is 1780/12 = 148.33
Now we combine all the Future Plans from 2000, which is:
==>( 4.2 + 2.4 + 3.4 + 4.5 ) = 14.5 ( Looks overestimated to me according to the results)
Using unitary method 14.5 * 148.33 = 2150 ( Approx)
Now comparing the enrollment in 2000 with 2004
2150 <----> 1780
In year 2000 around 370 more students took admission.
So, the estimated answer would be B. The enrollment declined by about 300 students.
I hope it could help and maybe we can deduce a solution for this problem.
Thanks for reading.
We combine all Future Plans for 2004 from first chart (Find Part-Time Employment + Find Full-Time Employment + Unsure + Transfer to Four Year Program)
==> ( 2 + 2 + 3 + 5) = 12.
Notice in the second chart, they have mentioned total number of student enrolled were 1780.
So by unitary method
Total 12 bar levels is 1780. So 1 bar level is 1780/12 = 148.33
Now we combine all the Future Plans from 2000, which is:
==>( 4.2 + 2.4 + 3.4 + 4.5 ) = 14.5 ( Looks overestimated to me according to the results)
Using unitary method 14.5 * 148.33 = 2150 ( Approx)
Now comparing the enrollment in 2000 with 2004
2150 <----> 1780
In year 2000 around 370 more students took admission.
So, the estimated answer would be B. The enrollment declined by about 300 students.
I hope it could help and maybe we can deduce a solution for this problem.
Thanks for reading.
