The owner of the Movies Galore concluded that to increase the profits, the operating expenses and the stocks of old movies have to be reduced. This has been based on the assumptions that customers are not ready to pay more than the present prices, that the service and quality of the products have not reduced and that the store at Marston has not done anything extra apart from reducing the timings and eliminating the old stocks like better advertisement and out reach exercise for the customers. Therefore, this memorandum is marred with basic assumptions full of flaws and deep irrationality.

First of all, to assume that the Galore is famous for only its special bargains is deeply flawed. It fails to answer the question that whether the present customer base is ready to pay more or not and whether such discounted price is at par with the current market prices for the service of Galore’s. A well surveyed data about the opinion of the customers might have revealed the actual cause of its publicity and an incisive analysis of market rates of similar products and services might have revealed the extent to which the present discount on the movies may be altered.

Secondly, the arugument of the owner failed to answer the question that whether the decline in profits can only be reversed through reducing operating costs and not by improving quality of services and products. For example, a quality check on the CD-ROMs, through which the movies are given to customers, might have helped to answer this question. Also, the delivery time, the store environment and the behviour of the store executives should have been examined before rejecting them as a cause fo reducing profits.

Finally, a pertinent question that whether the reduced timing and elimination of the stocks of old movies have resulted in the increased profit at Marston store or better advertisement and out reach efforts of store executives also played a vital role in reversing the declining trend of the profits. The stroe executive might hav advertised door to door about their improved services and offers which might have allured the customers.

In a nutshell the arugument presented in memorandum doesn’t answer many pertinent questions and is based on incomplete data and assumptions which are hollow irrartional. The argument can be made concrete with addition surveys and facts.